vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Climb Global Solutions, Inc. (CLMB) and dLocal Ltd (DLO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
dLocal Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($337.9M vs $182.4M, roughly 1.9× Climb Global Solutions, Inc.). dLocal Ltd runs the higher net margin — 16.5% vs 1.8%, a 14.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, dLocal Ltd posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (65.2% vs 32.1%).
Univar Solutions Inc. is a global chemical and ingredients distributor and provider of value-added services.
dLocal Limited is a Uruguayan financial technology company. It provides cross-border payments connecting global merchants to emerging markets.
CLMB vs DLO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $182.4M | $337.9M |
| Net Profit | $3.3M | $55.6M |
| Gross Margin | 14.5% | 34.3% |
| Operating Margin | 2.1% | 18.6% |
| Net Margin | 1.8% | 16.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 32.1% | 65.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -9.5% | 87.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.18 | $0.18 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $182.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $193.8M | $337.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $161.3M | $282.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $159.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $138.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $161.8M | $204.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $119.3M | $185.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $92.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | $3.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.0M | $55.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.7M | $141.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.0M | $29.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.5M | $90.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | 14.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.4% | 34.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.9% | 36.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.3% | 40.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.3% | 42.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.9% | 18.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | 19.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.2% | 20.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.1% | 22.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | 16.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 50.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.3% | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.6% | 48.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | — |
| Q1 26 | $0.18 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.51 | $0.18 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.02 | $0.17 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.30 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.81 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.52 | $0.09 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.19 | $0.09 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.75 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $41.8M | $719.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $86.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $118.4M | $569.4M |
| Total Assets | $458.8M | $1.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.15× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $41.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $36.6M | $719.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.8M | $604.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.8M | $425.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.1M | $560.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $86.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $63.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $39.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $118.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $116.6M | $569.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $109.3M | $504.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $105.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $95.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $90.6M | $489.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.7M | $457.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $79.8M | — |
| Q1 26 | $458.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $460.2M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $376.1M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $420.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $370.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $469.2M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $371.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $302.8M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.15× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.12× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.08× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $100.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $99.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 29.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.80× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $378.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-11.9M | $100.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.2M | $315.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.0M | $-141.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.6M | $108.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.3M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $99.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $313.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-141.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $107.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 29.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 110.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -69.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 57.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.70× | 1.80× | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.73× | 2.23× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.37× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.30× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.29× | -4.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.66× | 1.19× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.13× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
