vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Climb Global Solutions, Inc. (CLMB) and Doximity, Inc. (DOCS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Doximity, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($185.1M vs $182.4M, roughly 1.0× Climb Global Solutions, Inc.). Doximity, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 33.3% vs 1.8%, a 31.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Climb Global Solutions, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (32.1% vs 9.8%). Over the past eight quarters, Climb Global Solutions, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (40.7% CAGR vs 25.2%).
Univar Solutions Inc. is a global chemical and ingredients distributor and provider of value-added services.
Doximity is an online networking service for medical professionals. Launched in 2010, the platform offers its members curated medical news, telehealth tools, and case collaboration.
CLMB vs DOCS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $182.4M | $185.1M |
| Net Profit | $3.3M | $61.6M |
| Gross Margin | 14.5% | 89.9% |
| Operating Margin | 2.1% | 38.9% |
| Net Margin | 1.8% | 33.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 32.1% | 9.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -9.5% | -18.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.18 | $0.31 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $182.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $193.8M | $185.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $161.3M | $168.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $159.3M | $145.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $138.0M | $138.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $161.8M | $168.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $119.3M | $136.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $92.1M | $126.7M |
| Q1 26 | $3.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.0M | $61.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.7M | $62.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.0M | $53.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7M | $62.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.0M | $75.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.5M | $44.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4M | $41.4M |
| Q1 26 | 14.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.4% | 89.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.9% | 90.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.5% | 89.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.9% | 89.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.3% | 91.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.3% | 90.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.2% | 89.3% |
| Q1 26 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.9% | 38.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | 37.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.0% | 37.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.5% | 35.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.2% | 47.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.1% | 38.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.6% | 36.4% |
| Q1 26 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | 33.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 36.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 36.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.7% | 45.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.3% | 44.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.6% | 32.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | 32.7% |
| Q1 26 | $0.18 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.51 | $0.31 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.02 | $0.31 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.30 | $0.27 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.81 | $0.31 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.52 | $0.37 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.19 | $0.22 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.75 | $0.21 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $41.8M | $64.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $118.4M | $979.3M |
| Total Assets | $458.8M | $1.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $41.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $36.6M | $64.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.8M | $169.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.6M | $137.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.5M | $209.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.8M | $165.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.1M | $184.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.4M | $111.4M |
| Q1 26 | $118.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $116.6M | $979.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $109.3M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $105.2M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $95.6M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $90.6M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.7M | $961.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $79.8M | $913.6M |
| Q1 26 | $458.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $460.2M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $376.1M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $420.7M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $370.1M | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $469.2M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $371.9M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $302.8M | $1.1B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $60.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.99× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-11.9M | $60.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.2M | $93.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.2M | $62.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.5M | $98.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.0M | $65.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.6M | $68.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.3M | $41.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.70× | 0.99× | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.73× | 1.51× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.37× | 1.16× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.30× | 1.58× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.29× | 0.87× | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.66× | 1.55× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.13× | 1.00× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CLMB
Segment breakdown not available.
DOCS
| Subscription | $175.4M | 95% |
| Service Other | $9.7M | 5% |