vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Climb Global Solutions, Inc. (CLMB) and ENNIS, INC. (EBF). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Climb Global Solutions, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($182.4M vs $100.2M, roughly 1.8× ENNIS, INC.). ENNIS, INC. runs the higher net margin — 10.8% vs 1.8%, a 9.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Climb Global Solutions, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (32.1% vs 0.4%). Over the past eight quarters, Climb Global Solutions, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (40.7% CAGR vs 1.4%).
Univar Solutions Inc. is a global chemical and ingredients distributor and provider of value-added services.
ENNIS, INC. (ticker EBF) is a leading North American provider of printed business products and related services. Its offerings include custom business forms, pressure-sensitive labels, marketing collateral, promotional items, and branded packaging, serving clients across retail, healthcare, financial services, and small business segments.
CLMB vs EBF — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $182.4M | $100.2M |
| Net Profit | $3.3M | $10.8M |
| Gross Margin | 14.5% | 31.9% |
| Operating Margin | 2.1% | 15.0% |
| Net Margin | 1.8% | 10.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 32.1% | 0.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -9.5% | 6.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.18 | $0.42 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $182.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $193.8M | $100.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $161.3M | $98.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $159.3M | $97.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $138.0M | $92.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $161.8M | $99.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $119.3M | $99.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $92.1M | $103.1M |
| Q1 26 | $3.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.0M | $10.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.7M | $13.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.0M | $9.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7M | $9.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.0M | $10.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.5M | $10.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4M | $10.7M |
| Q1 26 | 14.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.4% | 31.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.9% | 30.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.5% | 31.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.9% | 29.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.3% | 29.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.3% | 30.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.2% | 30.0% |
| Q1 26 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.9% | 15.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | 12.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.0% | 13.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.5% | 13.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.2% | 13.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.1% | 13.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.6% | 13.3% |
| Q1 26 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | 10.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 13.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 10.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.7% | 9.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.3% | 10.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.6% | 10.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | 10.4% |
| Q1 26 | $0.18 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.51 | $0.42 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.02 | $0.51 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.30 | $0.38 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.81 | $0.34 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.52 | $0.39 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.19 | $0.40 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.75 | $0.41 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $41.8M | $31.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $118.4M | $304.8M |
| Total Assets | $458.8M | $354.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $41.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $36.6M | $31.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.8M | $31.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.6M | $32.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.5M | $72.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.8M | $68.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.1M | $122.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.4M | $123.7M |
| Q1 26 | $118.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $116.6M | $304.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $109.3M | $305.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $105.2M | $301.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $95.6M | $302.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $90.6M | $297.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.7M | $358.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $79.8M | $354.4M |
| Q1 26 | $458.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $460.2M | $354.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $376.1M | $361.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $420.7M | $361.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $370.1M | $348.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $469.2M | $346.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $371.9M | $406.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $302.8M | $406.2M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $16.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $15.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 15.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.52× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $42.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-11.9M | $16.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.2M | $10.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.2M | $8.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.5M | $12.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.0M | $18.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.6M | $11.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.3M | $23.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $15.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $9.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $6.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $11.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $17.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $10.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $20.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 15.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 9.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 6.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 12.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 17.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 10.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 20.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.70× | 1.52× | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.73× | 0.80× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.37× | 0.81× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.30× | 1.41× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.29× | 1.78× | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.66× | 1.15× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.13× | 2.16× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
