vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Climb Global Solutions, Inc. (CLMB) and Emerald Holding, Inc. (EEX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Climb Global Solutions, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($182.4M vs $132.7M, roughly 1.4× Emerald Holding, Inc.). Climb Global Solutions, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 1.8% vs -22.8%, a 24.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Climb Global Solutions, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (32.1% vs 24.3%). Over the past eight quarters, Climb Global Solutions, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (40.7% CAGR vs -0.3%).
Univar Solutions Inc. is a global chemical and ingredients distributor and provider of value-added services.
TVS Emerald Haven Realty Limited is an Indian real estate development company headquartered in Chennai, Tamil Nadu. A subsidiary of TVS Holdings, it specializes in sustainable residential communities and urban development projects.
CLMB vs EEX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $182.4M | $132.7M |
| Net Profit | $3.3M | $-30.2M |
| Gross Margin | 14.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | 2.1% | -11.8% |
| Net Margin | 1.8% | -22.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 32.1% | 24.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -9.5% | -692.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.18 | $-0.15 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $182.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $193.8M | $132.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $161.3M | $77.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $159.3M | $105.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $138.0M | $147.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $161.8M | $106.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $119.3M | $72.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $92.1M | $86.0M |
| Q1 26 | $3.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.0M | $-30.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.7M | $-14.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.0M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7M | $15.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.0M | $5.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.5M | $-11.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4M | $-2.8M |
| Q1 26 | 14.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.9% | -11.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | -10.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.0% | 9.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.5% | 24.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.2% | 19.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.1% | -6.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.6% | 7.4% |
| Q1 26 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | -22.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | -18.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | -1.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.7% | 10.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.3% | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.6% | -15.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | -3.3% |
| Q1 26 | $0.18 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.51 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.02 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.30 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.81 | $0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.52 | $0.01 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.19 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.75 | $-0.03 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $41.8M | $100.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $118.4M | $338.8M |
| Total Assets | $458.8M | $1.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $41.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $36.6M | $100.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.8M | $95.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.6M | $156.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.5M | $276.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.8M | $194.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.1M | $188.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.4M | $193.2M |
| Q1 26 | $118.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $116.6M | $338.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $109.3M | $369.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $105.2M | $389.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $95.6M | $392.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $90.6M | $385.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.7M | $391.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $79.8M | $407.6M |
| Q1 26 | $458.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $460.2M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $376.1M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $420.7M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $370.1M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $469.2M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $371.9M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $302.8M | $1.1B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $12.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $11.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 8.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $41.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-11.9M | $12.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.2M | $1.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.2M | $15.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.5M | $12.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.0M | $20.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.6M | $9.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.3M | $9.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $11.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $15.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $12.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $19.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $9.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $9.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 8.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 15.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 8.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 18.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 12.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 11.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.70× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.73× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.37× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.30× | 0.82× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.29× | 4.04× | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.66× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.13× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CLMB
Segment breakdown not available.
EEX
| Connections Segment | $121.9M | 92% |
| Commerce Segment | $5.5M | 4% |
| Content | $5.3M | 4% |
