vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Climb Global Solutions, Inc. (CLMB) and Five9, Inc. (FIVN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Five9, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($300.3M vs $182.4M, roughly 1.6× Climb Global Solutions, Inc.). On growth, Climb Global Solutions, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (32.1% vs 7.8%). Over the past eight quarters, Climb Global Solutions, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (40.7% CAGR vs 10.3%).
Univar Solutions Inc. is a global chemical and ingredients distributor and provider of value-added services.
Five9, Inc. is a leading global provider of cloud-native contact center software and solutions. It serves enterprises of all sizes across retail, healthcare, financial services, and technology sectors, offering omnichannel customer engagement tools, AI-powered automation, workforce management, and analytics to boost customer experience and operational efficiency.
CLMB vs FIVN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $182.4M | $300.3M |
| Net Profit | $3.3M | — |
| Gross Margin | 14.5% | 55.4% |
| Operating Margin | 2.1% | 6.6% |
| Net Margin | 1.8% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 32.1% | 7.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -9.5% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.18 | $0.22 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $182.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $193.8M | $300.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $161.3M | $285.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $159.3M | $283.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $138.0M | $279.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $161.8M | $278.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $119.3M | $264.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $92.1M | $252.1M |
| Q1 26 | $3.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.7M | $18.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.0M | $1.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7M | $576.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.5M | $-4.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4M | $-12.8M |
| Q1 26 | 14.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.4% | 55.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.9% | 55.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.5% | 54.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.9% | 55.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.3% | 56.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.3% | 53.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.2% | 53.0% |
| Q1 26 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.9% | 6.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | 5.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.0% | -0.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.5% | -1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.2% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.1% | -5.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.6% | -7.7% |
| Q1 26 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 6.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.7% | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.6% | -1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | -5.1% |
| Q1 26 | $0.18 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.51 | $0.22 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.02 | $0.21 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.30 | $0.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.81 | $0.01 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.52 | $0.16 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.19 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.75 | $-0.17 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $41.8M | $232.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $118.4M | $785.8M |
| Total Assets | $458.8M | $1.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $41.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $36.6M | $232.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.8M | $193.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.6M | $205.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.5M | $370.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.8M | $362.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.1M | $291.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.4M | $175.7M |
| Q1 26 | $118.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $116.6M | $785.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $109.3M | $775.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $105.2M | $717.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $95.6M | $664.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $90.6M | $622.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.7M | $565.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $79.8M | $525.9M |
| Q1 26 | $458.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $460.2M | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $376.1M | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $420.7M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $370.1M | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $469.2M | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $371.9M | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $302.8M | $1.9B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $83.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $77.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 25.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $201.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-11.9M | $83.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.2M | $59.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.2M | $35.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.5M | $48.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.0M | $49.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.6M | $41.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.3M | $19.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $77.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $48.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $31.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $43.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $40.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $26.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $13.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 25.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 17.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 11.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 15.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 10.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.70× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.73× | 3.29× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.37× | 30.38× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.30× | 84.00× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.29× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.66× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.13× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
