vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Climb Global Solutions, Inc. (CLMB) and James River Group Holdings, Inc. (JRVR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Climb Global Solutions, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($182.4M vs $167.7M, roughly 1.1× James River Group Holdings, Inc.). James River Group Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 19.1% vs 1.8%, a 17.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, James River Group Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (32.4% vs 32.1%). Over the past eight quarters, Climb Global Solutions, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (40.7% CAGR vs -8.7%).
Univar Solutions Inc. is a global chemical and ingredients distributor and provider of value-added services.
James River Corporation was an American pulp and paper company based in Richmond, Virginia, once the largest paper manufacturer in the world.
CLMB vs JRVR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $182.4M | $167.7M |
| Net Profit | $3.3M | $32.1M |
| Gross Margin | 14.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | 2.1% | 14.6% |
| Net Margin | 1.8% | 19.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 32.1% | 32.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -9.5% | 149.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.18 | $0.59 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $182.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $193.8M | $167.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $161.3M | $172.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $159.3M | $174.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $138.0M | $172.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $161.8M | $126.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $119.3M | $191.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $92.1M | $188.3M |
| Q1 26 | $3.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.0M | $32.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.7M | $1.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.0M | $4.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7M | $9.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.0M | $-64.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.5M | $-39.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4M | $7.6M |
| Q1 26 | 14.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.9% | 14.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.0% | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.5% | 9.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.2% | -57.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.1% | -27.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.6% | 10.7% |
| Q1 26 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | 19.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.7% | 5.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.3% | -51.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.6% | -20.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | 4.0% |
| Q1 26 | $0.18 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.51 | $0.59 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.02 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.30 | $0.06 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.81 | $0.16 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.52 | $-2.44 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.19 | $-1.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.75 | $0.13 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $41.8M | $260.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $118.4M | $538.2M |
| Total Assets | $458.8M | $4.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $41.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $36.6M | $260.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.8M | $238.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.6M | $220.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.5M | $279.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.8M | $362.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.1M | $359.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.4M | $672.5M |
| Q1 26 | $118.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $116.6M | $538.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $109.3M | $503.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $105.2M | $492.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $95.6M | $484.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $90.6M | $460.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.7M | $530.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $79.8M | $541.8M |
| Q1 26 | $458.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $460.2M | $4.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $376.1M | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $420.7M | $5.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $370.1M | $4.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $469.2M | $5.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $371.9M | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $302.8M | $4.7B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-18.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-23.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -14.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -0.59× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-17.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-11.9M | $-18.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.2M | $34.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.2M | $25.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.5M | $-51.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.0M | $-247.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.6M | $-269.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.3M | $-8.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-23.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $33.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $24.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-52.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-252.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-270.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-9.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -14.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 19.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 14.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -30.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -198.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -141.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -4.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.70× | -0.59× | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.73× | 33.61× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.37× | 5.29× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.30× | -5.38× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.29× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.66× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.13× | -1.14× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CLMB
Segment breakdown not available.
JRVR
| Excess And Surplus Lines | $156.7M | 93% |
| Specialty Admitted Insurance | $10.9M | 7% |
