vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Climb Global Solutions, Inc. (CLMB) and N-able, Inc. (NABL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Climb Global Solutions, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($182.4M vs $130.3M, roughly 1.4× N-able, Inc.). On growth, Climb Global Solutions, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (32.1% vs 11.8%). Over the past eight quarters, Climb Global Solutions, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (40.7% CAGR vs 7.0%).
Univar Solutions Inc. is a global chemical and ingredients distributor and provider of value-added services.
Able UK is a British industrial services company specialising in decommissioning of ships and offshore installations.
CLMB vs NABL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $182.4M | $130.3M |
| Net Profit | $3.3M | — |
| Gross Margin | 14.5% | 76.2% |
| Operating Margin | 2.1% | 10.2% |
| Net Margin | 1.8% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 32.1% | 11.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -9.5% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.18 | $-0.04 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $182.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $193.8M | $130.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $161.3M | $131.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $159.3M | $131.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $138.0M | $118.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $161.8M | $116.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $119.3M | $116.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $92.1M | $119.4M |
| Q1 26 | $3.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.7M | $1.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.0M | $-4.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7M | $-7.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.5M | $10.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4M | $9.5M |
| Q1 26 | 14.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.4% | 76.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.9% | 77.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.5% | 78.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.9% | 76.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.3% | 80.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.3% | 82.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.2% | 84.0% |
| Q1 26 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.9% | 10.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | 8.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.0% | 7.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.5% | 1.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.2% | 13.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.1% | 20.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.6% | 18.4% |
| Q1 26 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | -3.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.7% | -6.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.6% | 9.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | 7.9% |
| Q1 26 | $0.18 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.51 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.02 | $0.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.30 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.81 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.52 | $0.01 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.19 | $0.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.75 | $0.05 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $41.8M | $111.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $393.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $118.4M | $804.7M |
| Total Assets | $458.8M | $1.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.49× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $41.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $36.6M | $111.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.8M | $101.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.6M | $93.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.5M | $94.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.8M | $85.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.1M | $174.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.4M | $157.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $393.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $331.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $332.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $332.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $333.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $333.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $334.1M |
| Q1 26 | $118.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $116.6M | $804.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $109.3M | $813.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $105.2M | $809.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $95.6M | $775.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $90.6M | $759.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.7M | $765.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $79.8M | $724.4M |
| Q1 26 | $458.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $460.2M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $376.1M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $420.7M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $370.1M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $469.2M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $371.9M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $302.8M | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.49× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.43× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.44× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.44× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.46× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $25.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $20.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 16.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $75.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-11.9M | $25.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.2M | $24.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.2M | $24.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.5M | $19.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.0M | $26.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.6M | $22.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.3M | $27.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $20.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $17.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $20.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $16.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $18.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $18.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $24.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 16.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 13.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 15.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 13.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 16.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 15.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 20.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.70× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.73× | 17.36× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.37× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.30× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.29× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.66× | 2.04× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.13× | 2.89× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CLMB
Segment breakdown not available.
NABL
| Transferred Over Time | $121.9M | 94% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $8.4M | 6% |
| Other Revenue | $1.3M | 1% |
