vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Climb Global Solutions, Inc. (CLMB) and PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (PCOR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($349.1M vs $182.4M, roughly 1.9× Climb Global Solutions, Inc.). Climb Global Solutions, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 1.8% vs -10.8%, a 12.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Climb Global Solutions, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (32.1% vs 15.6%). Over the past eight quarters, Climb Global Solutions, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (40.7% CAGR vs 13.8%).
Univar Solutions Inc. is a global chemical and ingredients distributor and provider of value-added services.
Procore Technologies is an American construction management software as a service company founded in 2002, with headquarters in Carpinteria, California. Procore hosts a platform to connect those involved in the construction industry on a global platform. The software allows for the creation of simplified workflows and displays a consolidated view of construction products that includes the tracking of tasks, management of project workflows, and scheduling.
CLMB vs PCOR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $182.4M | $349.1M |
| Net Profit | $3.3M | $-37.6M |
| Gross Margin | 14.5% | 80.1% |
| Operating Margin | 2.1% | -12.3% |
| Net Margin | 1.8% | -10.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 32.1% | 15.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -9.5% | 39.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.18 | $-0.25 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $182.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $193.8M | $349.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $161.3M | $338.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $159.3M | $323.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $138.0M | $310.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $161.8M | $302.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $119.3M | $295.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $92.1M | $284.3M |
| Q1 26 | $3.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.0M | $-37.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.7M | $-9.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.0M | $-21.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7M | $-33.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.0M | $-62.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.5M | $-26.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4M | $-6.3M |
| Q1 26 | 14.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.4% | 80.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.9% | 79.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.5% | 79.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.9% | 79.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.3% | 81.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.3% | 81.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.2% | 83.1% |
| Q1 26 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.9% | -12.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | -4.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.0% | -9.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.5% | -11.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.2% | -21.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.1% | -12.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.6% | -5.2% |
| Q1 26 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | -10.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | -2.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | -6.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.7% | -10.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.3% | -20.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.6% | -8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | -2.2% |
| Q1 26 | $0.18 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.51 | $-0.25 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.02 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.30 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.81 | $-0.22 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.52 | $-0.42 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.19 | $-0.18 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.75 | $-0.04 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $41.8M | $768.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $118.4M | $1.3B |
| Total Assets | $458.8M | $2.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $41.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $36.6M | $768.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.8M | $684.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.6M | $620.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.5M | $566.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.8M | $775.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.1M | $756.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.4M | $735.4M |
| Q1 26 | $118.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $116.6M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $109.3M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $105.2M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $95.6M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $90.6M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.7M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $79.8M | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | $458.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $460.2M | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $376.1M | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $420.7M | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $370.1M | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $469.2M | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $371.9M | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $302.8M | $2.0B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $114.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $109.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 31.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $282.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-11.9M | $114.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.2M | $88.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.2M | $30.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.5M | $66.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.0M | $29.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.6M | $39.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.3M | $58.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $109.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $83.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $27.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $62.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $17.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $35.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $56.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 31.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 24.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 8.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 20.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 12.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 20.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.70× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.73× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.37× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.30× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.29× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.66× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.13× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CLMB
Segment breakdown not available.
PCOR
| US | $298.3M | 85% |
| Non Us | $50.9M | 15% |
