vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Climb Global Solutions, Inc. (CLMB) and PagerDuty, Inc. (PD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Climb Global Solutions, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($182.4M vs $124.5M, roughly 1.5× PagerDuty, Inc.). PagerDuty, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 129.7% vs 1.8%, a 127.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Climb Global Solutions, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (32.1% vs 4.7%). Over the past eight quarters, Climb Global Solutions, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (40.7% CAGR vs 5.9%).
Univar Solutions Inc. is a global chemical and ingredients distributor and provider of value-added services.
PagerDuty, Inc. is an American cloud computing company specializing in a SaaS incident management platform for IT operations departments.
CLMB vs PD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $182.4M | $124.5M |
| Net Profit | $3.3M | $161.6M |
| Gross Margin | 14.5% | 85.3% |
| Operating Margin | 2.1% | 6.5% |
| Net Margin | 1.8% | 129.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 32.1% | 4.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -9.5% | 2827.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.18 | $1.69 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $182.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $193.8M | $124.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $161.3M | $123.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $159.3M | $119.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $138.0M | $121.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $161.8M | $118.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $119.3M | $115.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $92.1M | $111.2M |
| Q1 26 | $3.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.0M | $161.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.7M | $9.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.0M | $-7.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7M | $-8.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.0M | $-5.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.5M | $-10.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4M | $-17.1M |
| Q1 26 | 14.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.4% | 85.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.9% | 84.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.5% | 84.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.9% | 83.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.3% | 83.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.3% | 82.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.2% | 82.6% |
| Q1 26 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.9% | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.0% | -8.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.5% | -9.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.2% | -8.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.1% | -13.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.6% | -19.5% |
| Q1 26 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | 129.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | -6.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.7% | -7.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.3% | -5.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.6% | -9.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | -15.4% |
| Q1 26 | $0.18 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.51 | $1.69 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.02 | $0.10 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.30 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.81 | $-0.12 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.52 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.19 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.75 | $-0.26 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $41.8M | $547.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $118.4M | $320.5M |
| Total Assets | $458.8M | $1.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $41.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $36.6M | $547.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.8M | $567.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.6M | $597.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.5M | $570.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.8M | $542.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.1M | $599.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.4M | $592.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $484.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $118.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $116.6M | $320.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $109.3M | $180.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $105.2M | $145.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $95.6M | $129.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $90.6M | $111.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.7M | $164.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $79.8M | $174.0M |
| Q1 26 | $458.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $460.2M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $376.1M | $891.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $420.7M | $926.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $370.1M | $927.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $469.2M | $866.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $371.9M | $916.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $302.8M | $924.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.73× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $24.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $24.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 19.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.15× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $117.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-11.9M | $24.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.2M | $34.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.2M | $30.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.5M | $31.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.0M | $22.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.6M | $35.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.3M | $28.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $24.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $33.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $30.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $30.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $21.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $35.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $28.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 19.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 26.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 25.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 24.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 18.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 30.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 25.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.70× | 0.15× | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.73× | 3.55× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.37× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.30× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.29× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.66× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.13× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CLMB
Segment breakdown not available.
PD
| US | $88.8M | 71% |
| Non Us | $35.7M | 29% |
