vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Climb Global Solutions, Inc. (CLMB) and Phreesia, Inc. (PHR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Climb Global Solutions, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($182.4M vs $120.3M, roughly 1.5× Phreesia, Inc.). Phreesia, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 3.5% vs 1.8%, a 1.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Climb Global Solutions, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (32.1% vs 12.7%).
Univar Solutions Inc. is a global chemical and ingredients distributor and provider of value-added services.
Phreesia, Inc. is a software as a service company that offers healthcare organizations a set of applications to automate and manage patient intake.
CLMB vs PHR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $182.4M | $120.3M |
| Net Profit | $3.3M | $4.3M |
| Gross Margin | 14.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | 2.1% | 3.1% |
| Net Margin | 1.8% | 3.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 32.1% | 12.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -9.5% | 129.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.18 | $0.07 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $182.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $193.8M | $120.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $161.3M | $117.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $159.3M | $115.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $138.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $161.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $119.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $92.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | $3.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.0M | $4.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.7M | $654.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.0M | $-3.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | 14.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.9% | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | -1.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.0% | -2.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | -3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | — |
| Q1 26 | $0.18 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.51 | $0.07 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.02 | $0.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.30 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.81 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.52 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.19 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.75 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $41.8M | $106.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $3.4M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $118.4M | $320.3M |
| Total Assets | $458.8M | $423.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.01× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $41.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $36.6M | $106.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.8M | $98.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.6M | $90.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $6.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $118.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $116.6M | $320.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $109.3M | $298.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $105.2M | $282.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $95.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $90.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $79.8M | — |
| Q1 26 | $458.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $460.2M | $423.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $376.1M | $408.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $420.7M | $400.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $370.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $469.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $371.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $302.8M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.01× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.02× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.02× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $15.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $12.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 10.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 3.62× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-11.9M | $15.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.2M | $14.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.2M | $14.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.3M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $12.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $13.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $11.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 11.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 9.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.70× | 3.62× | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.73× | 22.68× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.37× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.30× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.29× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.66× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.13× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CLMB
Segment breakdown not available.
PHR
| Subscription And Services | $55.5M | 46% |
| Network Solutions | $37.4M | 31% |
| Payment Processing Fees | $27.4M | 23% |
