vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Climb Global Solutions, Inc. (CLMB) and QUALYS, INC. (QLYS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Climb Global Solutions, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($182.4M vs $175.3M, roughly 1.0× QUALYS, INC.). QUALYS, INC. runs the higher net margin — 30.3% vs 1.8%, a 28.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Climb Global Solutions, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (32.1% vs 10.1%). Over the past eight quarters, Climb Global Solutions, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (40.7% CAGR vs 9.6%).
Univar Solutions Inc. is a global chemical and ingredients distributor and provider of value-added services.
Qualys, Inc. is an American technology firm based in Foster City, California, specializing in cloud security, compliance and related services.
CLMB vs QLYS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $182.4M | $175.3M |
| Net Profit | $3.3M | $53.1M |
| Gross Margin | 14.5% | 83.4% |
| Operating Margin | 2.1% | 33.6% |
| Net Margin | 1.8% | 30.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 32.1% | 10.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -9.5% | 20.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.18 | $1.47 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $182.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $193.8M | $175.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $161.3M | $169.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $159.3M | $164.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $138.0M | $159.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $161.8M | $159.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $119.3M | $153.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $92.1M | $148.7M |
| Q1 26 | $3.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.0M | $53.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.7M | $50.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.0M | $47.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7M | $47.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.0M | $44.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.5M | $46.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4M | $43.8M |
| Q1 26 | 14.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.4% | 83.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.9% | 83.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.5% | 82.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.9% | 81.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.3% | 81.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.3% | 81.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.2% | 82.2% |
| Q1 26 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.9% | 33.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | 35.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.0% | 31.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.5% | 32.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.2% | 31.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.1% | 29.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.6% | 32.3% |
| Q1 26 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | 30.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 29.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 28.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.7% | 29.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.3% | 27.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.6% | 30.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | 29.4% |
| Q1 26 | $0.18 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.51 | $1.47 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.02 | $1.39 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.30 | $1.29 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.81 | $1.29 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.52 | $1.19 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.19 | $1.24 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.75 | $1.17 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $41.8M | $250.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $118.4M | $561.2M |
| Total Assets | $458.8M | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $41.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $36.6M | $250.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.8M | $225.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.6M | $194.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.5M | $290.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.8M | $232.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.1M | $235.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.4M | $281.2M |
| Q1 26 | $118.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $116.6M | $561.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $109.3M | $529.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $105.2M | $508.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $95.6M | $498.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $90.6M | $477.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.7M | $449.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $79.8M | $427.8M |
| Q1 26 | $458.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $460.2M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $376.1M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $420.7M | $999.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $370.1M | $996.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $469.2M | $973.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $371.9M | $908.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $302.8M | $876.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $75.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $74.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 42.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.42× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $304.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-11.9M | $75.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.2M | $90.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.2M | $33.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.5M | $109.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.0M | $47.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.6M | $61.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.3M | $49.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $74.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $89.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $32.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $107.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $41.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $57.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $48.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 42.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 52.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 19.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 67.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 26.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 37.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 32.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.70× | 1.42× | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.73× | 1.80× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.37× | 0.71× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.30× | 2.31× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.29× | 1.09× | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.66× | 1.32× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.13× | 1.14× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CLMB
Segment breakdown not available.
QLYS
| Sales Channel Through Intermediary | $88.6M | 51% |
| Sales Channel Directly To Consumer | $86.7M | 49% |
