vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Climb Global Solutions, Inc. (CLMB) and ROGERS CORP (ROG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ROGERS CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($200.5M vs $182.4M, roughly 1.1× Climb Global Solutions, Inc.). ROGERS CORP runs the higher net margin — 2.2% vs 1.8%, a 0.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Climb Global Solutions, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (32.1% vs 5.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Climb Global Solutions, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (40.7% CAGR vs -3.3%).
Univar Solutions Inc. is a global chemical and ingredients distributor and provider of value-added services.
Rogers Corporation is a specialty engineered materials company headquartered in Chandler, Arizona.
CLMB vs ROG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $182.4M | $200.5M |
| Net Profit | $3.3M | $4.5M |
| Gross Margin | 14.5% | 32.2% |
| Operating Margin | 2.1% | — |
| Net Margin | 1.8% | 2.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 32.1% | 5.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -9.5% | 421.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.18 | $0.25 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $182.4M | $200.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $193.8M | $201.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $161.3M | $216.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $159.3M | $202.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $138.0M | $190.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $161.8M | $192.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $119.3M | $210.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $92.1M | $214.2M |
| Q1 26 | $3.3M | $4.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.0M | $4.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.7M | $8.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.0M | $-73.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.0M | $-500.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.5M | $10.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4M | $8.1M |
| Q1 26 | 14.5% | 32.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.4% | 31.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.9% | 33.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.5% | 31.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.9% | 29.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.3% | 32.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.3% | 35.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.2% | 34.1% |
| Q1 26 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.9% | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | 7.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.0% | -33.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.5% | -0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.2% | -6.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.1% | 6.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.6% | 5.3% |
| Q1 26 | 1.8% | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | -36.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.7% | -0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.3% | -0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.6% | 5.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | 3.8% |
| Q1 26 | $0.18 | $0.25 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.51 | $0.20 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.02 | $0.48 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.30 | $-4.00 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.81 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.52 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.19 | $0.58 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.75 | $0.44 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $41.8M | $195.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $118.4M | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $458.8M | $1.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $41.8M | $195.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $36.6M | $197.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.8M | $167.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.6M | $157.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.5M | $175.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.8M | $159.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.1M | $146.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.4M | $119.9M |
| Q1 26 | $118.4M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $116.6M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $109.3M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $105.2M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $95.6M | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $90.6M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.7M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $79.8M | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | $458.8M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $460.2M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $376.1M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $420.7M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $370.1M | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $469.2M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $371.9M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $302.8M | $1.5B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $5.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $1.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 0.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.29× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $70.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $5.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-11.9M | $46.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.2M | $28.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.2M | $13.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.5M | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.0M | $33.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.6M | $42.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.3M | $22.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $42.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $21.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $18.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $25.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $8.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 20.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 9.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 12.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 8.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.29× | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.70× | 10.20× | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.73× | 3.36× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.37× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.30× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.29× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.66× | 3.96× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.13× | 2.83× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
