vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Climb Global Solutions, Inc. (CLMB) and Safehold Inc. (SAFE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Climb Global Solutions, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($182.4M vs $97.9M, roughly 1.9× Safehold Inc.). Safehold Inc. runs the higher net margin — 28.5% vs 1.8%, a 26.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Climb Global Solutions, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (32.1% vs 6.5%). Over the past eight quarters, Climb Global Solutions, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (40.7% CAGR vs 2.5%).
Univar Solutions Inc. is a global chemical and ingredients distributor and provider of value-added services.
SAFE Investment Company Limited is a Chinese sovereign wealth fund based in Hong Kong.
CLMB vs SAFE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $182.4M | $97.9M |
| Net Profit | $3.3M | $27.9M |
| Gross Margin | 14.5% | 98.6% |
| Operating Margin | 2.1% | 27.4% |
| Net Margin | 1.8% | 28.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 32.1% | 6.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -9.5% | 7.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.18 | $0.38 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $182.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $193.8M | $97.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $161.3M | $96.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $159.3M | $93.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $138.0M | $97.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $161.8M | $91.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $119.3M | $90.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $92.1M | $89.9M |
| Q1 26 | $3.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.0M | $27.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.7M | $29.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.0M | $27.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7M | $29.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.0M | $26.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.5M | $19.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4M | $29.7M |
| Q1 26 | 14.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.4% | 98.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.9% | 98.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.5% | 99.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.9% | 98.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.3% | 98.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.3% | 98.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.2% | 98.8% |
| Q1 26 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.9% | 27.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | 25.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.0% | 25.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.5% | 25.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.2% | 24.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.1% | 17.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.6% | 26.7% |
| Q1 26 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | 28.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 30.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 29.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.7% | 30.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.3% | 28.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.6% | 21.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | 33.0% |
| Q1 26 | $0.18 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.51 | $0.38 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.02 | $0.41 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.30 | $0.39 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.81 | $0.41 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.52 | $0.36 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.19 | $0.27 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.75 | $0.42 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $41.8M | $21.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $4.6B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $118.4M | $2.4B |
| Total Assets | $458.8M | $7.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.90× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $41.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $36.6M | $21.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.8M | $12.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.6M | $13.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.5M | $17.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.8M | $8.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.1M | $15.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.4M | $13.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $4.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.2B |
| Q1 26 | $118.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $116.6M | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $109.3M | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $105.2M | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $95.6M | $2.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $90.6M | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.7M | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $79.8M | $2.3B |
| Q1 26 | $458.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $460.2M | $7.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $376.1M | $7.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $420.7M | $7.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $370.1M | $6.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $469.2M | $6.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $371.9M | $6.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $302.8M | $6.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.90× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.89× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.87× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.85× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.84× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.88× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.81× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $47.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.72× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-11.9M | $47.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.2M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.2M | $28.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.5M | $8.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.0M | $37.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.6M | $8.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.3M | $24.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.70× | 1.72× | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.73× | -0.05× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.37× | 1.00× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.30× | 0.30× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.29× | 1.45× | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.66× | 0.43× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.13× | 0.83× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CLMB
Segment breakdown not available.
SAFE
| Equity Method Investment Nonconsolidated Investee Or Group Of Investees | $60.3M | 62% |
| Other | $33.7M | 34% |
| Stabilized Properties | $3.8M | 4% |
