vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Climb Global Solutions, Inc. (CLMB) and Seadrill Ltd (SDRL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Seadrill Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($273.0M vs $182.4M, roughly 1.5× Climb Global Solutions, Inc.). Climb Global Solutions, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 1.8% vs -3.7%, a 5.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. Over the past eight quarters, Climb Global Solutions, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (40.7% CAGR vs -8.9%).
Univar Solutions Inc. is a global chemical and ingredients distributor and provider of value-added services.
Seadrill is an offshore drilling contractor providing worldwide offshore drilling services to the oil and gas industry. Its primary business is the ownership and operation of drillships, semi-submersible rigs, and jack-up rigs for operations in shallow to ultra-deep water in both benign and harsh environments. It provides a contract-based service and primarily serves the oil super-majors, integrated oil and gas, state-owned national oil, and independent oil and gas companies.
CLMB vs SDRL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $182.4M | $273.0M |
| Net Profit | $3.3M | $-10.0M |
| Gross Margin | 14.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | 2.1% | -1.1% |
| Net Margin | 1.8% | -3.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 32.1% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -9.5% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.18 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $182.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $193.8M | $273.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $161.3M | $280.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $159.3M | $288.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $138.0M | $248.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $161.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $119.3M | $263.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $92.1M | $267.0M |
| Q1 26 | $3.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.0M | $-10.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.7M | $-11.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.0M | $-42.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7M | $-14.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.5M | $32.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4M | $253.0M |
| Q1 26 | 14.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.9% | -1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | 9.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.0% | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.5% | 7.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.1% | 17.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | -3.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | -3.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | -14.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.7% | -5.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.6% | 12.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | 94.8% |
| Q1 26 | $0.18 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.51 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.02 | $-0.17 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.30 | $-0.68 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.81 | $-0.23 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.52 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.19 | $0.49 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.75 | $3.49 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $41.8M | $339.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $613.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $118.4M | $2.9B |
| Total Assets | $458.8M | $3.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.21× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $41.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $36.6M | $339.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.8M | $402.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.6M | $393.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.5M | $404.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.4M | $835.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $613.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $612.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $612.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $611.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $609.0M |
| Q1 26 | $118.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $116.6M | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $109.3M | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $105.2M | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $95.6M | $2.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $90.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.7M | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $79.8M | $3.1B |
| Q1 26 | $458.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $460.2M | $3.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $376.1M | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $420.7M | $4.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $370.1M | $4.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $469.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $371.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $302.8M | $4.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.21× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.21× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.21× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.21× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.20× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-40.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-11.9M | $-40.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.2M | $28.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.2M | $11.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.5M | $-27.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.6M | $-27.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.3M | $79.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.70× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.73× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.37× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.30× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.29× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.66× | -0.84× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.13× | 0.31× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
