vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Climb Global Solutions, Inc. (CLMB) and STAG Industrial, Inc. (STAG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
STAG Industrial, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($224.2M vs $182.4M, roughly 1.2× Climb Global Solutions, Inc.). STAG Industrial, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 27.6% vs 1.8%, a 25.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Climb Global Solutions, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (32.1% vs 9.1%). Over the past eight quarters, Climb Global Solutions, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (40.7% CAGR vs 8.7%).
Univar Solutions Inc. is a global chemical and ingredients distributor and provider of value-added services.
Stag Arms is a firearms manufacturer founded in May 2003 and located in Cheyenne, Wyoming. Stag Arms is a manufacturer of the AR-15 type rifle, marketed as Stag-15 rifles. Stag advertises that all their weapons and accessories are made in the United States. They are best known for their left-handed AR-15 rifles, which use a mirror imaged upper receiver and have the ejection port reversed for left-handed shooters and the safety selector control on the right side of the lower receiver.
CLMB vs STAG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $182.4M | $224.2M |
| Net Profit | $3.3M | $62.0M |
| Gross Margin | 14.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | 2.1% | — |
| Net Margin | 1.8% | 27.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 32.1% | 9.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -9.5% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.18 | $0.32 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $182.4M | $224.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $193.8M | $220.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $161.3M | $211.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $159.3M | $207.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $138.0M | $205.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $161.8M | $199.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $119.3M | $190.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $92.1M | $189.8M |
| Q1 26 | $3.3M | $62.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.0M | $83.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.7M | $48.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.0M | $50.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7M | $91.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.0M | $51.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.5M | $41.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4M | $59.8M |
| Q1 26 | 14.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | 1.8% | 27.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | 37.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 23.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 24.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.7% | 44.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.3% | 25.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.6% | 21.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | 31.5% |
| Q1 26 | $0.18 | $0.32 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.51 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.02 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.30 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.81 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.52 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.19 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.75 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $41.8M | $8.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $118.4M | $3.6B |
| Total Assets | $458.8M | $7.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $41.8M | $8.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $36.6M | $14.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.8M | $17.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.6M | $15.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.5M | $9.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.8M | $36.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.1M | $70.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.4M | $33.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.8B |
| Q1 26 | $118.4M | $3.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $116.6M | $3.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $109.3M | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $105.2M | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $95.6M | $3.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $90.6M | $3.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.7M | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $79.8M | $3.3B |
| Q1 26 | $458.8M | $7.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $460.2M | $7.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $376.1M | $6.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $420.7M | $6.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $370.1M | $6.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $469.2M | $6.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $371.9M | $6.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $302.8M | $6.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.91× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.91× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.88× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.87× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.88× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.89× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.84× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.