vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Climb Global Solutions, Inc. (CLMB) and Terreno Realty Corp (TRNO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Climb Global Solutions, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($182.4M vs $137.5M, roughly 1.3× Terreno Realty Corp). Terreno Realty Corp runs the higher net margin — 115.1% vs 1.8%, a 113.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Terreno Realty Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (32.6% vs 32.1%). Over the past eight quarters, Climb Global Solutions, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (40.7% CAGR vs 27.2%).
Univar Solutions Inc. is a global chemical and ingredients distributor and provider of value-added services.
Terreno Realty Corp is a publicly traded real estate investment trust that specializes in owning, operating, and acquiring high-quality industrial real estate assets. Its portfolio mainly includes distribution warehouses and logistics facilities located in high-demand coastal U.S. metropolitan markets, serving tenants across e-commerce, last-mile delivery, retail supply chain, and light manufacturing segments.
CLMB vs TRNO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $182.4M | $137.5M |
| Net Profit | $3.3M | $158.2M |
| Gross Margin | 14.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | 2.1% | — |
| Net Margin | 1.8% | 115.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 32.1% | 32.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -9.5% | 107.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.18 | $1.54 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $182.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $193.8M | $137.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $161.3M | $116.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $159.3M | $112.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $138.0M | $110.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $161.8M | $103.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $119.3M | $99.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $92.1M | $94.2M |
| Q1 26 | $3.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.0M | $158.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.7M | $103.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.0M | $93.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7M | $48.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.0M | $76.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.5M | $36.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4M | $35.7M |
| Q1 26 | 14.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | 115.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 88.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 83.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.7% | 43.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.3% | 73.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.6% | 36.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | 37.9% |
| Q1 26 | $0.18 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.51 | $1.54 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.02 | $1.00 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.30 | $0.90 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.81 | $0.47 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.52 | $0.78 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.19 | $0.37 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.75 | $0.37 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $41.8M | $25.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $943.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $118.4M | $4.1B |
| Total Assets | $458.8M | $5.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.23× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $41.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $36.6M | $25.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.8M | $26.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.6M | $128.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.5M | $156.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.8M | $18.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.1M | $243.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.4M | $182.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $943.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $742.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $741.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $823.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $672.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $772.0M |
| Q1 26 | $118.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $116.6M | $4.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $109.3M | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $105.2M | $3.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $95.6M | $3.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $90.6M | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.7M | $3.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $79.8M | $3.4B |
| Q1 26 | $458.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $460.2M | $5.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $376.1M | $5.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $420.7M | $5.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $370.1M | $4.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $469.2M | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $371.9M | $4.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $302.8M | $4.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.23× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.26× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.19× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.19× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.22× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.19× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.22× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $271.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.72× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-11.9M | $271.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.2M | $79.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.2M | $60.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.5M | $61.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.0M | $232.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.6M | $70.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.3M | $64.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.70× | 1.72× | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.73× | 0.77× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.37× | 0.65× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.30× | 1.28× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.29× | 3.06× | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.66× | 1.91× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.13× | 1.80× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CLMB
Segment breakdown not available.
TRNO
| Disposal Group Disposed Of By Sale Not Discontinued Operations | $109.5M | 80% |
| Other | $23.8M | 17% |
| At Market Equity Offering Program500Million | $4.1M | 3% |
