vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Climb Global Solutions, Inc. (CLMB) and Xometry, Inc. (XMTR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Xometry, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($192.4M vs $182.4M, roughly 1.1× Climb Global Solutions, Inc.). Climb Global Solutions, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 1.8% vs -4.5%, a 6.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Climb Global Solutions, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (32.1% vs 29.5%). Over the past eight quarters, Climb Global Solutions, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (40.7% CAGR vs 25.2%).
Univar Solutions Inc. is a global chemical and ingredients distributor and provider of value-added services.
Xometry is an online marketplace for sourcing on-demand manufactured parts for prototyping and large-scale production.
CLMB vs XMTR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $182.4M | $192.4M |
| Net Profit | $3.3M | $-8.6M |
| Gross Margin | 14.5% | 39.1% |
| Operating Margin | 2.1% | -4.6% |
| Net Margin | 1.8% | -4.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 32.1% | 29.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -9.5% | 12.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.18 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $182.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $193.8M | $192.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $161.3M | $180.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $159.3M | $162.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $138.0M | $151.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $161.8M | $148.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $119.3M | $141.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $92.1M | $132.6M |
| Q1 26 | $3.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.0M | $-8.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.7M | $-11.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.0M | $-26.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7M | $-15.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.0M | $-9.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.5M | $-10.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4M | $-13.7M |
| Q1 26 | 14.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.4% | 39.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.9% | 39.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.5% | 40.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.9% | 37.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.3% | 39.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.3% | 39.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.2% | 39.9% |
| Q1 26 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.9% | -4.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | -6.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.0% | -6.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.5% | -10.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.2% | -7.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.1% | -8.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.6% | -11.5% |
| Q1 26 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | -4.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | -6.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | -16.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.7% | -10.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.3% | -6.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.6% | -7.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | -10.3% |
| Q1 26 | $0.18 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.51 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.02 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.30 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.81 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.52 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.19 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.75 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $41.8M | $219.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $118.4M | $275.6M |
| Total Assets | $458.8M | $703.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $41.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $36.6M | $219.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.8M | $224.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.6M | $225.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.5M | $231.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.8M | $239.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.1M | $234.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.4M | $240.9M |
| Q1 26 | $118.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $116.6M | $275.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $109.3M | $272.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $105.2M | $270.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $95.6M | $309.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $90.6M | $314.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.7M | $315.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $79.8M | $315.8M |
| Q1 26 | $458.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $460.2M | $703.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $376.1M | $698.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $420.7M | $687.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $370.1M | $690.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $469.2M | $680.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $371.9M | $678.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $302.8M | $678.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $4.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-5.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -3.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 5.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-24.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-11.9M | $4.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.2M | $5.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.2M | $-427.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.5M | $-3.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.0M | $9.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.6M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.3M | $-9.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-5.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-1.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-7.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-9.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-8.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-13.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -3.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -4.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -6.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -6.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -10.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 5.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.70× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.73× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.37× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.30× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.29× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.66× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.13× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CLMB
Segment breakdown not available.
XMTR
| US | $159.1M | 83% |
| Non Us | $33.3M | 17% |
