vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Climb Global Solutions, Inc. (CLMB) and EXPRO GROUP HOLDINGS N.V. (XPRO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
EXPRO GROUP HOLDINGS N.V. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($382.1M vs $182.4M, roughly 2.1× Climb Global Solutions, Inc.). Climb Global Solutions, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 1.8% vs 1.5%, a 0.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Climb Global Solutions, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (32.1% vs -12.5%). Over the past eight quarters, Climb Global Solutions, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (40.7% CAGR vs -0.2%).
Univar Solutions Inc. is a global chemical and ingredients distributor and provider of value-added services.
Expro is an energy services provider headquartered in Houston, Texas, United States.
CLMB vs XPRO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $182.4M | $382.1M |
| Net Profit | $3.3M | $5.8M |
| Gross Margin | 14.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | 2.1% | 3.1% |
| Net Margin | 1.8% | 1.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 32.1% | -12.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -9.5% | -74.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.18 | $0.05 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $182.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $193.8M | $382.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $161.3M | $411.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $159.3M | $422.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $138.0M | $390.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $161.8M | $436.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $119.3M | $422.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $92.1M | $469.6M |
| Q1 26 | $3.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.0M | $5.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.7M | $14.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.0M | $18.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7M | $13.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.0M | $23.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.5M | $16.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4M | $15.3M |
| Q1 26 | 14.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.9% | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | 6.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.0% | 7.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.5% | 2.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.2% | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.1% | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.6% | 5.9% |
| Q1 26 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.7% | 3.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.3% | 5.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.6% | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | 3.3% |
| Q1 26 | $0.18 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.51 | $0.05 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.02 | $0.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.30 | $0.16 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.81 | $0.12 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.52 | $0.20 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.19 | $0.14 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.75 | $0.13 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $41.8M | $196.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $79.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $118.4M | $1.5B |
| Total Assets | $458.8M | $2.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.05× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $41.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $36.6M | $196.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.8M | $197.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.6M | $206.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.5M | $179.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.8M | $183.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.1M | $165.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.4M | $133.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $79.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $99.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $121.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $121.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $121.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $121.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $121.1M |
| Q1 26 | $118.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $116.6M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $109.3M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $105.2M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $95.6M | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $90.6M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.7M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $79.8M | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | $458.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $460.2M | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $376.1M | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $420.7M | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $370.1M | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $469.2M | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $371.9M | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $302.8M | $2.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.05× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.07× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.08× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.08× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.08× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.08× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.08× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $57.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $23.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 6.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 8.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 9.89× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $97.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-11.9M | $57.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.2M | $63.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.2M | $48.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.5M | $41.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.0M | $97.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.6M | $55.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.3M | $-13.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $23.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $39.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $27.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $8.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $53.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $23.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-49.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 6.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 9.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 6.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 12.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -10.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 8.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 8.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 10.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 7.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.70× | 9.89× | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.73× | 4.52× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.37× | 2.69× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.30× | 2.98× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.29× | 4.23× | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.66× | 3.40× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.13× | -0.86× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CLMB
Segment breakdown not available.
XPRO
| NLA | $130.3M | 34% |
| ESSA | $116.3M | 30% |
| MENA | $93.0M | 24% |
| Other | $42.5M | 11% |