vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Clean Energy Fuels Corp. (CLNE) and Montrose Environmental Group, Inc. (MEG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Montrose Environmental Group, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($193.3M vs $117.6M, roughly 1.6× Clean Energy Fuels Corp.). Montrose Environmental Group, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -4.3% vs -10.6%, a 6.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Montrose Environmental Group, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.2% vs 0.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Montrose Environmental Group, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (11.5% CAGR vs 9.5%).

Bloom Energy is an American public company that designs and manufactures solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) which independently produce electricity onsite for power generation in data centers, manufacturing, and other commercial sectors. Founded in 2001 and headquartered in San Jose, California; its fuel cell technology generates electricity through a chemical conversion process, which differs from most other power sources reliant on combustion, and can use natural gas, biogas or hydrogen as fuel...

Montrose Environmental Group, Inc. is an American multinational corporation that provides wide-ranging environmental services. The company is vertically integrated across the environmental industry and supports public and private sector clientele. Montrose is headquartered in Little Rock, Arkansas and incorporated in the U.S. state of Delaware.

CLNE vs MEG — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
MEG
MEG
1.6× larger
MEG
$193.3M
$117.6M
CLNE
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
MEG
MEG
+2.2% gap
MEG
2.2%
0.0%
CLNE
Higher net margin
MEG
MEG
6.3% more per $
MEG
-4.3%
-10.6%
CLNE
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
MEG
MEG
Annualised
MEG
11.5%
9.5%
CLNE

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
CLNE
CLNE
MEG
MEG
Revenue
$117.6M
$193.3M
Net Profit
$-12.4M
$-8.2M
Gross Margin
38.6%
Operating Margin
-2.5%
-1.3%
Net Margin
-10.6%
-4.3%
Revenue YoY
0.0%
2.2%
Net Profit YoY
70.9%
EPS (diluted)
$-0.13

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
CLNE
CLNE
MEG
MEG
Q1 26
$117.6M
Q4 25
$112.3M
$193.3M
Q3 25
$106.1M
$224.9M
Q2 25
$102.6M
$234.5M
Q1 25
$103.8M
$177.8M
Q4 24
$109.3M
$189.1M
Q3 24
$104.9M
$178.7M
Q2 24
$98.0M
$173.3M
Net Profit
CLNE
CLNE
MEG
MEG
Q1 26
$-12.4M
Q4 25
$-43.0M
$-8.2M
Q3 25
$-23.8M
$8.4M
Q2 25
$-20.2M
$18.4M
Q1 25
$-135.0M
$-19.4M
Q4 24
$-30.2M
$-28.2M
Q3 24
$-18.2M
$-10.6M
Q2 24
$-16.3M
$-10.2M
Gross Margin
CLNE
CLNE
MEG
MEG
Q1 26
Q4 25
38.6%
Q3 25
39.4%
Q2 25
43.4%
Q1 25
39.0%
Q4 24
40.8%
Q3 24
40.9%
Q2 24
39.9%
Operating Margin
CLNE
CLNE
MEG
MEG
Q1 26
-2.5%
Q4 25
-9.5%
-1.3%
Q3 25
-12.8%
4.4%
Q2 25
-9.0%
6.4%
Q1 25
-121.7%
-5.9%
Q4 24
-11.8%
-12.1%
Q3 24
-8.1%
-0.6%
Q2 24
-5.7%
-1.5%
Net Margin
CLNE
CLNE
MEG
MEG
Q1 26
-10.6%
Q4 25
-38.3%
-4.3%
Q3 25
-22.4%
3.7%
Q2 25
-19.7%
7.8%
Q1 25
-130.1%
-10.9%
Q4 24
-27.6%
-14.9%
Q3 24
-17.3%
-5.9%
Q2 24
-16.6%
-5.9%
EPS (diluted)
CLNE
CLNE
MEG
MEG
Q1 26
Q4 25
$-0.21
$-0.13
Q3 25
$-0.11
$0.21
Q2 25
$-0.09
$0.42
Q1 25
$-0.60
$-0.64
Q4 24
$-0.14
$-0.91
Q3 24
$-0.08
$-0.39
Q2 24
$-0.07
$-0.39

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
CLNE
CLNE
MEG
MEG
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$70.8M
$11.2M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$54.0K
$277.1M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$563.7M
$451.2M
Total Assets
$1.0B
$981.3M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.00×
0.61×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
CLNE
CLNE
MEG
MEG
Q1 26
$70.8M
Q4 25
$156.1M
$11.2M
Q3 25
$232.2M
$6.7M
Q2 25
$240.8M
$10.5M
Q1 25
$226.6M
$30.3M
Q4 24
$217.5M
$12.9M
Q3 24
$243.5M
$13.0M
Q2 24
$249.3M
$16.9M
Total Debt
CLNE
CLNE
MEG
MEG
Q1 26
$54.0K
Q4 25
$226.8M
$277.1M
Q3 25
$284.3M
$302.4M
Q2 25
$277.9M
$264.6M
Q1 25
$271.6M
$235.6M
Q4 24
$265.4M
$204.8M
Q3 24
$264.1M
$233.0M
Q2 24
$263.0M
$188.7M
Stockholders' Equity
CLNE
CLNE
MEG
MEG
Q1 26
$563.7M
Q4 25
$559.4M
$451.2M
Q3 25
$585.2M
$458.7M
Q2 25
$590.8M
$470.3M
Q1 25
$596.7M
$444.1M
Q4 24
$713.3M
$446.3M
Q3 24
$724.8M
$449.2M
Q2 24
$723.0M
$448.8M
Total Assets
CLNE
CLNE
MEG
MEG
Q1 26
$1.0B
Q4 25
$1.1B
$981.3M
Q3 25
$1.1B
$985.7M
Q2 25
$1.1B
$998.1M
Q1 25
$1.1B
$992.2M
Q4 24
$1.2B
$990.4M
Q3 24
$1.2B
$1.0B
Q2 24
$1.2B
$943.9M
Debt / Equity
CLNE
CLNE
MEG
MEG
Q1 26
0.00×
Q4 25
0.41×
0.61×
Q3 25
0.49×
0.66×
Q2 25
0.47×
0.56×
Q1 25
0.46×
0.53×
Q4 24
0.37×
0.46×
Q3 24
0.36×
0.52×
Q2 24
0.36×
0.42×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
CLNE
CLNE
MEG
MEG
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$51.9M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$46.5M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
24.1%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
2.8%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$91.2M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
CLNE
CLNE
MEG
MEG
Q1 26
Q4 25
$13.1M
$51.9M
Q3 25
$13.1M
$28.1M
Q2 25
$35.9M
$21.9M
Q1 25
$23.4M
$5.5M
Q4 24
$21.9M
$32.0M
Q3 24
$21.4M
$11.4M
Q2 24
$18.8M
$894.0K
Free Cash Flow
CLNE
CLNE
MEG
MEG
Q1 26
Q4 25
$6.5M
$46.5M
Q3 25
$6.5M
$22.3M
Q2 25
$30.9M
$19.9M
Q1 25
$15.9M
$2.4M
Q4 24
$10.3M
$29.7M
Q3 24
$42.0K
$10.2M
Q2 24
$4.8M
$-9.8M
FCF Margin
CLNE
CLNE
MEG
MEG
Q1 26
Q4 25
5.8%
24.1%
Q3 25
6.1%
9.9%
Q2 25
30.2%
8.5%
Q1 25
15.4%
1.3%
Q4 24
9.5%
15.7%
Q3 24
0.0%
5.7%
Q2 24
4.9%
-5.6%
Capex Intensity
CLNE
CLNE
MEG
MEG
Q1 26
Q4 25
5.9%
2.8%
Q3 25
6.2%
2.6%
Q2 25
4.8%
0.8%
Q1 25
7.2%
1.8%
Q4 24
10.5%
1.2%
Q3 24
20.3%
0.6%
Q2 24
14.2%
6.1%
Cash Conversion
CLNE
CLNE
MEG
MEG
Q1 26
Q4 25
Q3 25
3.36×
Q2 25
1.19×
Q1 25
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

CLNE
CLNE

Product revenue$102.9M88%
Service revenue$14.7M12%

MEG
MEG

Segment breakdown not available.

Related Comparisons