vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Clean Energy Fuels Corp. (CLNE) and Triumph Financial, Inc. (TFIN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Triumph Financial, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.4B vs $2.0B, roughly 1.2× Clean Energy Fuels Corp.). Triumph Financial, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 0.3% vs -6.7%, a 6.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Triumph Financial, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (100.5% vs -0.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Triumph Financial, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (377.6% CAGR vs 354.7%).
Bloom Energy is an American public company that designs and manufactures solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) which independently produce electricity onsite for power generation in data centers, manufacturing, and other commercial sectors. Founded in 2001 and headquartered in San Jose, California; its fuel cell technology generates electricity through a chemical conversion process, which differs from most other power sources reliant on combustion, and can use natural gas, biogas or hydrogen as fuel...
The Triumph Motor Company was a British car and motor manufacturing company in the 19th and 20th centuries. The marque had its origins in 1885 when Siegfried Bettmann of Nuremberg formed S. Bettmann & Co. and started importing bicycles from Europe and selling them under his own trade name in London. The trade name became "Triumph" the following year, and in 1887 Bettmann was joined by a partner, Moritz Schulte, also from Germany. In 1889, the businessmen started producing their own bicycles i...
CLNE vs TFIN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.0B | $2.4B |
| Net Profit | $-135.0M | $6.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | 86.1% |
| Operating Margin | 88.6% | — |
| Net Margin | -6.7% | 0.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -0.0% | 100.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.23 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $2.0B | $2.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $112.3M | $120.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $106.1M | $109.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $102.6M | $108.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $103.8M | $101.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $109.3M | $103.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $104.9M | $106.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $98.0M | $105.1M |
| Q1 26 | $-135.0M | $6.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-43.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-23.8M | $1.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-20.2M | $4.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-135.0M | $17.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-30.2M | $3.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-18.2M | $5.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-16.3M | $2.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | 86.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | 88.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -9.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -12.8% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.0% | 7.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -121.7% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -11.8% | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.1% | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.7% | 3.4% |
| Q1 26 | -6.7% | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | -38.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -22.4% | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -19.7% | 4.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -130.1% | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -27.6% | 3.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -17.3% | 5.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -16.6% | 2.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.23 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.21 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $0.04 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.09 | $0.15 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.60 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.14 | $0.13 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.08 | $0.19 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.07 | $0.08 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $552.0K | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $52.0K | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $565.1M | $950.7M |
| Total Assets | $1.1B | $6.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.00× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $552.0K | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $156.1M | $248.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $232.2M | $147.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $240.8M | $282.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $226.6M | $502.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $217.5M | $330.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $243.5M | $489.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $249.3M | $500.7M |
| Q1 26 | $52.0K | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $226.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $284.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $277.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $271.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $265.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $264.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $263.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | $565.1M | $950.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $559.4M | $941.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $585.2M | $919.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $590.8M | $912.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $596.7M | $893.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $713.3M | $890.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $724.8M | $885.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $723.0M | $874.2M |
| Q1 26 | $1.1B | $6.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $6.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $6.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $6.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $6.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $5.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $5.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $5.8B |
| Q1 26 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.41× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.49× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.47× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.46× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.37× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.36× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.36× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
