vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Clipper Realty Inc. (CLPR) and DELCATH SYSTEMS, INC. (DCTH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Clipper Realty Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($37.1M vs $20.7M, roughly 1.8× DELCATH SYSTEMS, INC.). DELCATH SYSTEMS, INC. runs the higher net margin — -9.1% vs -30.4%, a 21.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, DELCATH SYSTEMS, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (37.3% vs -2.6%). Over the past eight quarters, DELCATH SYSTEMS, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (157.0% CAGR vs 1.8%).
Clipper Equity LLC is a partnership led by David Bistricer and Sam Levinson. The firm owns more than 60 buildings, with thousands of residential units, in New York and New Jersey. The partnership are known for their attempted purchase of the Starrett City housing complex in Brooklyn, New York, for $1.3 billion on February 8, 2007, in one of the largest real estate transactions in history. New York's Mayor Michael Bloomberg expressed concerns over the new landlord's history of building violati...
Delcath Systems, Inc. is a publicly traded specialty pharmaceutical and medical device company, that develops percutaneous perfusion technologies for the targeted administration of high-dose chemotherapeutic agents to specific organs or regions of the body. Based in Queensbury, New York, the company has an intellectual property portfolio consisting of 28 patents worldwide. Delcath's Percutaneous Hepatic Perfusion (PHP) is currently undergoing Phase II and Phase III trials against tumors in th...
CLPR vs DCTH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $37.1M | $20.7M |
| Net Profit | $-11.3M | $-1.9M |
| Gross Margin | -5.2% | 85.5% |
| Operating Margin | 21.8% | -10.5% |
| Net Margin | -30.4% | -9.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.6% | 37.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -938.6% | 44.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.05 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $37.1M | $20.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $37.7M | $20.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $39.0M | $24.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $39.4M | $19.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $38.0M | $15.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $37.6M | $11.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $37.3M | $7.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $35.8M | $3.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-11.3M | $-1.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.6M | $830.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.4M | $2.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-35.1M | $1.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.1M | $-3.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.1M | $1.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.7M | $-13.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.7M | $-11.1M |
| Q4 25 | -5.2% | 85.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.6% | 87.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.8% | 86.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -34.5% | 85.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.8% | 85.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.6% | 85.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 26.8% | 80.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 25.4% | 71.2% |
| Q4 25 | 21.8% | -10.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.6% | -1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.7% | 10.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -59.9% | 3.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.1% | 20.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.6% | -11.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 26.8% | -50.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 25.4% | -327.4% |
| Q4 25 | -30.4% | -9.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -12.2% | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.5% | 11.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -89.1% | 5.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.9% | -22.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.9% | 16.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.7% | -176.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -7.5% | -354.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.05 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.07 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.03 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.48 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.45 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $30.8M | $43.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-30.7M | $111.2M |
| Total Assets | $1.2B | $123.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $30.8M | $43.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.1M | $41.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.0M | $34.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.3M | $12.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.9M | $32.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.6M | $8.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.3M | $14.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $21.9M | $11.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $0 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $2.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $4.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | $7.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-30.7M | $111.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-25.0M | $114.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-21.9M | $105.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-20.1M | $80.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-5.4M | $68.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.6M | $8.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.8M | $4.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $279.0K | $14.6M |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $123.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $124.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $116.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $87.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $76.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $31.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $33.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.3B | $36.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.23× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.07× | ||
| Q1 24 | 4396.73× | 0.50× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $22.6M | $8.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $7.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 37.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $21.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $22.6M | $8.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4M | $4.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.4M | $7.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.7M | $2.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $31.9M | $-1.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.3M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.8M | $-4.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.3M | $-9.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $7.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $6.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.6M | $2.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-37.9M | $-1.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-3.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-4.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-14.7M | $-9.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 37.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 21.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 28.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -11.7% | 10.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -99.5% | -8.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -34.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -58.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -41.1% | -305.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.6% | 0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 183.3% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 58.6% | 0.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.75× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.70× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.06× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -1.95× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CLPR
| Residential Segment | $30.8M | 83% |
| Commercial Real Estate | $6.2M | 17% |
DCTH
| HEPZATOKIT | $19.1M | 92% |
| CHEMOSAT | $1.7M | 8% |
