vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Clipper Realty Inc. (CLPR) and TANTECH HOLDINGS LTD (TANH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Clipper Realty Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($37.1M vs $21.5M, roughly 1.7× TANTECH HOLDINGS LTD). TANTECH HOLDINGS LTD runs the higher net margin — 8.2% vs -30.4%, a 38.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, TANTECH HOLDINGS LTD posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-0.2% vs -2.6%).
Clipper Equity LLC is a partnership led by David Bistricer and Sam Levinson. The firm owns more than 60 buildings, with thousands of residential units, in New York and New Jersey. The partnership are known for their attempted purchase of the Starrett City housing complex in Brooklyn, New York, for $1.3 billion on February 8, 2007, in one of the largest real estate transactions in history. New York's Mayor Michael Bloomberg expressed concerns over the new landlord's history of building violati...
Tantech Holdings Ltd is a China-based specialty manufacturing enterprise focused on R&D, production and distribution of bamboo-derived carbon products, high-performance clean energy materials and eco-friendly consumer goods, serving customers across Chinese and global markets in consumer goods, industrial materials and new energy segments.
CLPR vs TANH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $37.1M | $21.5M |
| Net Profit | $-11.3M | $1.8M |
| Gross Margin | -5.2% | 22.2% |
| Operating Margin | 21.8% | 10.8% |
| Net Margin | -30.4% | 8.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.6% | -0.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -938.6% | 59.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $37.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $37.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $39.0M | $21.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $39.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $38.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $37.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $37.3M | $21.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $35.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-11.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.4M | $1.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-35.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.7M | $1.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | -5.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.8% | 22.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -34.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 26.8% | 22.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 25.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 21.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.7% | 10.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -59.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 26.8% | 8.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 25.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | -30.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -12.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.5% | 8.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -89.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.7% | 5.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -7.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.21 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $30.8M | $35.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-30.7M | $128.3M |
| Total Assets | $1.2B | $143.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $30.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.0M | $35.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.3M | $34.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $21.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | — |
| Q4 25 | $-30.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-25.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-21.9M | $128.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-20.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-5.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.8M | $126.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $279.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $143.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $142.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.3B | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 4396.73× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $22.6M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $22.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $31.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.8M | $4.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-37.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-14.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -11.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -99.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 20.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -41.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 183.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 58.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.01× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CLPR
| Residential Segment | $30.8M | 83% |
| Commercial Real Estate | $6.2M | 17% |
TANH
| Revenue from China | $20.9M | 97% |
| Revenue directly from foreign countries | $602.2K | 3% |
