vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of CLPS Inc (CLPS) and Sila Realty Trust, Inc. (SILA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

CLPS Inc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($82.8M vs $50.1M, roughly 1.7× Sila Realty Trust, Inc.). Sila Realty Trust, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 10.0% vs 0.2%, a 9.8% gap on every dollar of revenue.

CLPS Inc is a global information technology, consulting and digital solutions provider primarily serving the financial services sector, including banking, insurance and asset management clients. It also offers tailored tech solutions for retail, healthcare and e-commerce segments, with operating footprints across North America, Asia Pacific and Europe.

Sila Realty Trust, Inc. is a U.S.-based real estate investment trust that owns, operates, and acquires high-quality income-generating commercial properties. Its core portfolio covers industrial logistics facilities, office assets and mixed-use properties, serving tenants across logistics, corporate and retail segments to deliver stable long-term returns.

CLPS vs SILA — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
CLPS
CLPS
1.7× larger
CLPS
$82.8M
$50.1M
SILA
Higher net margin
SILA
SILA
9.8% more per $
SILA
10.0%
0.2%
CLPS

Income Statement — Q4 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
CLPS
CLPS
SILA
SILA
Revenue
$82.8M
$50.1M
Net Profit
$183.0K
$5.0M
Gross Margin
23.1%
88.9%
Operating Margin
0.2%
Net Margin
0.2%
10.0%
Revenue YoY
7.6%
Net Profit YoY
-54.9%
EPS (diluted)
$0.10

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
CLPS
CLPS
SILA
SILA
Q2 26
$82.8M
Q4 25
$50.1M
Q3 25
$49.8M
Q2 25
$48.7M
Q1 25
$48.3M
Q4 24
$71.8M
$46.5M
Q3 24
$46.1M
Q2 24
$43.6M
Net Profit
CLPS
CLPS
SILA
SILA
Q2 26
$183.0K
Q4 25
$5.0M
Q3 25
$11.6M
Q2 25
$8.6M
Q1 25
$7.9M
Q4 24
$-993.5K
$11.1M
Q3 24
$11.9M
Q2 24
$4.6M
Gross Margin
CLPS
CLPS
SILA
SILA
Q2 26
23.1%
Q4 25
88.9%
Q3 25
88.1%
Q2 25
87.7%
Q1 25
86.9%
Q4 24
21.9%
87.3%
Q3 24
87.4%
Q2 24
86.6%
Operating Margin
CLPS
CLPS
SILA
SILA
Q2 26
0.2%
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
-1.3%
Q3 24
Q2 24
Net Margin
CLPS
CLPS
SILA
SILA
Q2 26
0.2%
Q4 25
10.0%
Q3 25
23.3%
Q2 25
17.6%
Q1 25
16.4%
Q4 24
-1.4%
23.9%
Q3 24
25.9%
Q2 24
10.6%
EPS (diluted)
CLPS
CLPS
SILA
SILA
Q2 26
Q4 25
$0.10
Q3 25
$0.21
Q2 25
$0.15
Q1 25
$0.14
Q4 24
$0.20
Q3 24
$0.21
Q2 24
$0.08

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
CLPS
CLPS
SILA
SILA
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$29.1M
$32.3M
Total DebtLower is stronger
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$57.6M
$1.3B
Total Assets
$118.1M
$2.1B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
CLPS
CLPS
SILA
SILA
Q2 26
$29.1M
Q4 25
$32.3M
Q3 25
$27.7M
Q2 25
$24.8M
Q1 25
$30.5M
Q4 24
$31.2M
$39.8M
Q3 24
$28.6M
Q2 24
$87.0M
Stockholders' Equity
CLPS
CLPS
SILA
SILA
Q2 26
$57.6M
Q4 25
$1.3B
Q3 25
$1.3B
Q2 25
$1.4B
Q1 25
$1.4B
Q4 24
$63.9M
$1.4B
Q3 24
$1.4B
Q2 24
$1.5B
Total Assets
CLPS
CLPS
SILA
SILA
Q2 26
$118.1M
Q4 25
$2.1B
Q3 25
$2.1B
Q2 25
$2.0B
Q1 25
$2.0B
Q4 24
$110.0M
$2.0B
Q3 24
$2.0B
Q2 24
$2.1B

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
CLPS
CLPS
SILA
SILA
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$119.1M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
23.76×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
CLPS
CLPS
SILA
SILA
Q2 26
Q4 25
$119.1M
Q3 25
$30.0M
Q2 25
$31.9M
Q1 25
$24.1M
Q4 24
$132.8M
Q3 24
$29.1M
Q2 24
$31.6M
Cash Conversion
CLPS
CLPS
SILA
SILA
Q2 26
Q4 25
23.76×
Q3 25
2.59×
Q2 25
3.71×
Q1 25
3.06×
Q4 24
11.95×
Q3 24
2.43×
Q2 24
6.84×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons