vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CLPS Inc (CLPS) and Zhihu Inc. (ZH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Zhihu Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($92.0M vs $82.8M, roughly 1.1× CLPS Inc). Zhihu Inc. runs the higher net margin — 32.7% vs 0.2%, a 32.5% gap on every dollar of revenue.
CLPS Inc is a global information technology, consulting and digital solutions provider primarily serving the financial services sector, including banking, insurance and asset management clients. It also offers tailored tech solutions for retail, healthcare and e-commerce segments, with operating footprints across North America, Asia Pacific and Europe.
Zhihu is a Chinese social question and answer site and news aggregator. Originally based in Chengdu and with creators from Sichuan, China, the website launched on January 26, 2011. The number of registered users on Zhihu exceeded 10 million by the end of 2013, and reached 17 million as of May 2015, with 250 million monthly page views.
CLPS vs ZH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $82.8M | $92.0M |
| Net Profit | $183.0K | $30.1M |
| Gross Margin | 23.1% | 53.6% |
| Operating Margin | 0.2% | — |
| Net Margin | 0.2% | 32.7% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q2 26 | $82.8M | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $92.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $92.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $100.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $100.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $71.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $120.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $128.5M |
| Q2 26 | $183.0K | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $30.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-993.5K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-1.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-11.1M |
| Q2 26 | 23.1% | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | 53.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 61.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 62.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 61.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 63.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 59.6% |
| Q2 26 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -15.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -12.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -10.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -19.7% |
| Q2 26 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | 32.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -1.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -8.6% |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $29.1M | $481.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $57.6M | $554.1M |
| Total Assets | $118.1M | $742.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 26 | $29.1M | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $481.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $383.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $446.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $446.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $31.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $458.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $434.7M |
| Q2 26 | $57.6M | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $554.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $578.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $587.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $573.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $63.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $619.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $605.5M |
| Q2 26 | $118.1M | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $742.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $772.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $802.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $783.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $110.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $856.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $840.5M |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
