vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of CELESTICA INC (CLS) and Union Pacific Corporation (UNP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Union Pacific Corporation is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($6.2B vs $4.0B, roughly 1.5× CELESTICA INC). Union Pacific Corporation runs the higher net margin — 27.4% vs 5.2%, a 22.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CELESTICA INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (52.8% vs 3.2%). Union Pacific Corporation produced more free cash flow last quarter ($631.0M vs $137.9M). Over the past eight quarters, CELESTICA INC's revenue compounded faster (35.4% CAGR vs 1.7%).

Celestica Inc. is a Canadian multinational design, manufacturing, hardware platform, and supply chain electronics manufacturing services (EMS) company, which is headquartered in Toronto, Ontario. The company operates in 50 sites across 15 countries.

The Union Pacific Railroad Company is a Class I freight-hauling railroad that operates 8,300 locomotives over 32,200 miles (51,800 km) routes in 23 U.S. states west of Chicago and New Orleans. Union Pacific is the second-largest railroad in the United States after BNSF.

CLS vs UNP — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
UNP
UNP
1.5× larger
UNP
$6.2B
$4.0B
CLS
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
CLS
CLS
+49.6% gap
CLS
52.8%
3.2%
UNP
Higher net margin
UNP
UNP
22.1% more per $
UNP
27.4%
5.2%
CLS
More free cash flow
UNP
UNP
$493.1M more FCF
UNP
$631.0M
$137.9M
CLS
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
CLS
CLS
Annualised
CLS
35.4%
1.7%
UNP

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
CLS
CLS
UNP
UNP
Revenue
$4.0B
$6.2B
Net Profit
$212.3M
$1.7B
Gross Margin
10.8%
Operating Margin
6723.5%
39.5%
Net Margin
5.2%
27.4%
Revenue YoY
52.8%
3.2%
Net Profit YoY
146.3%
4.6%
EPS (diluted)
$1.83
$2.87

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
CLS
CLS
UNP
UNP
Q1 26
$4.0B
$6.2B
Q4 25
$3.7B
$6.1B
Q3 25
$3.2B
$6.2B
Q2 25
$2.9B
$6.2B
Q1 25
$2.6B
$6.0B
Q4 24
$6.1B
Q3 24
$2.5B
$6.1B
Q2 24
$2.4B
$6.0B
Net Profit
CLS
CLS
UNP
UNP
Q1 26
$212.3M
$1.7B
Q4 25
$267.5M
$1.8B
Q3 25
$267.8M
$1.8B
Q2 25
$211.0M
$1.9B
Q1 25
$86.2M
$1.6B
Q4 24
$1.8B
Q3 24
$89.5M
$1.7B
Q2 24
$95.0M
$1.7B
Gross Margin
CLS
CLS
UNP
UNP
Q1 26
10.8%
Q4 25
11.8%
Q3 25
13.0%
Q2 25
12.8%
Q1 25
10.3%
Q4 24
Q3 24
10.4%
Q2 24
10.6%
Operating Margin
CLS
CLS
UNP
UNP
Q1 26
6723.5%
39.5%
Q4 25
8.6%
39.5%
Q3 25
10.2%
40.8%
Q2 25
9.4%
41.0%
Q1 25
4.9%
39.3%
Q4 24
41.3%
Q3 24
5.5%
39.7%
Q2 24
5.6%
40.0%
Net Margin
CLS
CLS
UNP
UNP
Q1 26
5.2%
27.4%
Q4 25
7.3%
30.4%
Q3 25
8.4%
28.6%
Q2 25
7.3%
30.5%
Q1 25
3.3%
27.0%
Q4 24
28.8%
Q3 24
3.6%
27.4%
Q2 24
4.0%
27.9%
EPS (diluted)
CLS
CLS
UNP
UNP
Q1 26
$1.83
$2.87
Q4 25
$2.29
$3.12
Q3 25
$2.31
$3.01
Q2 25
$1.82
$3.15
Q1 25
$0.74
$2.70
Q4 24
$2.91
Q3 24
$0.75
$2.75
Q2 24
$0.80
$2.74

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
CLS
CLS
UNP
UNP
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$378.0M
$735.0M
Total DebtLower is stronger
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$2.1B
Total Assets
$8260.0B
$69.6B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
CLS
CLS
UNP
UNP
Q1 26
$378.0M
$735.0M
Q4 25
$595.6M
$1.3B
Q3 25
$305.9M
$808.0M
Q2 25
$313.8M
$1.1B
Q1 25
$303.0M
$1.4B
Q4 24
$1.0B
Q3 24
$947.0M
Q2 24
$1.1B
Total Debt
CLS
CLS
UNP
UNP
Q1 26
Q4 25
$750.5M
$30.3B
Q3 25
$756.7M
$30.3B
Q2 25
$848.6M
$30.3B
Q1 25
$915.0M
$30.6B
Q4 24
$29.8B
Q3 24
$29.8B
Q2 24
$31.2B
Stockholders' Equity
CLS
CLS
UNP
UNP
Q1 26
$2.1B
Q4 25
$2.2B
$18.5B
Q3 25
$2.0B
$17.3B
Q2 25
$1.8B
$16.3B
Q1 25
$1.6B
$16.0B
Q4 24
$16.9B
Q3 24
$1.8B
$16.6B
Q2 24
$1.8B
$16.5B
Total Assets
CLS
CLS
UNP
UNP
Q1 26
$8260.0B
$69.6B
Q4 25
$7.2B
$69.7B
Q3 25
$6.6B
$68.6B
Q2 25
$6.2B
$68.6B
Q1 25
$5.8B
$68.5B
Q4 24
$67.7B
Q3 24
$67.6B
Q2 24
$67.8B
Debt / Equity
CLS
CLS
UNP
UNP
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.34×
1.64×
Q3 25
0.37×
1.75×
Q2 25
0.48×
1.86×
Q1 25
0.59×
1.91×
Q4 24
1.76×
Q3 24
1.79×
Q2 24
1.89×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
CLS
CLS
UNP
UNP
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$356.3M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$137.9M
$631.0M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
3.4%
10.1%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.68×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$502.6M
$4.8B

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
CLS
CLS
UNP
UNP
Q1 26
$356.3M
Q4 25
$250.6M
$2.2B
Q3 25
$126.2M
$2.5B
Q2 25
$152.4M
$2.3B
Q1 25
$130.3M
$2.2B
Q4 24
$2.7B
Q3 24
$122.8M
$2.7B
Q2 24
$99.6M
$1.9B
Free Cash Flow
CLS
CLS
UNP
UNP
Q1 26
$137.9M
$631.0M
Q4 25
$155.9M
$1.2B
Q3 25
$88.9M
$1.6B
Q2 25
$119.9M
$1.4B
Q1 25
$93.6M
$1.3B
Q4 24
$1.7B
Q3 24
$76.8M
$1.8B
Q2 24
$62.7M
$1.0B
FCF Margin
CLS
CLS
UNP
UNP
Q1 26
3.4%
10.1%
Q4 25
4.3%
20.1%
Q3 25
2.8%
25.2%
Q2 25
4.1%
22.7%
Q1 25
3.5%
21.6%
Q4 24
28.4%
Q3 24
3.1%
29.9%
Q2 24
2.6%
16.8%
Capex Intensity
CLS
CLS
UNP
UNP
Q1 26
Q4 25
2.6%
16.4%
Q3 25
1.2%
15.2%
Q2 25
1.1%
15.2%
Q1 25
1.4%
15.0%
Q4 24
15.1%
Q3 24
1.8%
13.6%
Q2 24
1.5%
15.0%
Cash Conversion
CLS
CLS
UNP
UNP
Q1 26
1.68×
Q4 25
0.94×
1.20×
Q3 25
0.47×
1.41×
Q2 25
0.72×
1.24×
Q1 25
1.51×
1.36×
Q4 24
1.51×
Q3 24
1.37×
1.59×
Q2 24
1.05×
1.14×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

CLS
CLS

Segment breakdown not available.

UNP
UNP

Freight revenues$5.9B95%
Other revenues$324.0M5%

Related Comparisons