vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CLEANSPARK, INC. (CLSK) and CSW INDUSTRIALS, INC. (CSW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CSW INDUSTRIALS, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($233.0M vs $181.2M, roughly 1.3× CLEANSPARK, INC.). CSW INDUSTRIALS, INC. runs the higher net margin — 4.4% vs -209.0%, a 213.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CSW INDUSTRIALS, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (20.3% vs 11.6%). CSW INDUSTRIALS, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($22.7M vs $-198.1M). Over the past eight quarters, CLEANSPARK, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (106.4% CAGR vs 5.1%).
CleanSpark, Inc. is a U.S.-headquartered sustainable technology company operating two core business segments: low-carbon Bitcoin mining powered primarily by renewable and stranded energy resources, and end-to-end microgrid design, deployment, and operation services for commercial, industrial, and public sector clients across North America.
CLSK vs CSW — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $181.2M | $233.0M |
| Net Profit | $-378.7M | $10.3M |
| Gross Margin | 47.2% | 39.7% |
| Operating Margin | -174.7% | 7.4% |
| Net Margin | -209.0% | 4.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.6% | 20.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -253.5% | -61.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.62 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $181.2M | $233.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $277.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $263.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $230.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $193.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $89.3M | $227.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $104.1M | $226.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $111.8M | $210.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-378.7M | $10.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $40.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $40.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $35.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $26.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-62.2M | $36.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-236.2M | $38.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $126.7M | $31.8M |
| Q4 25 | 47.2% | 39.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 43.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 43.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 44.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 41.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 36.0% | 45.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 56.6% | 47.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 69.3% | 44.4% |
| Q4 25 | -174.7% | 7.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 20.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 20.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 19.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 15.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -73.5% | 22.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -239.2% | 24.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 21.0% |
| Q4 25 | -209.0% | 4.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 14.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 15.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 15.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 13.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -69.6% | 15.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -226.9% | 17.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 113.4% | 15.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.62 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.41 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.43 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.60 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.26 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.47 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.03 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $458.1M | $40.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.8B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.4B | $1.1B |
| Total Assets | $3.3B | $2.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.29× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $458.1M | $40.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $31.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $38.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $225.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $213.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $121.2M | $273.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $126.1M | $18.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $22.2M |
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $800.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.1M | $166.0M |
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $650.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | $615.7M |
| Q4 25 | $3.3B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | $1.0B |
| Q4 25 | 1.29× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.00× | 0.27× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-161.1M | $28.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-198.1M | $22.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -109.3% | 9.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 20.4% | 2.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.81× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-626.9M | $162.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-161.1M | $28.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $61.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $60.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $27.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $11.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-233.7M | $66.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-58.4M | $62.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-44.8M | $22.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-198.1M | $22.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $58.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $57.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $22.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $8.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-299.8M | $61.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-68.7M | $59.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-60.3M | $17.5M |
| Q4 25 | -109.3% | 9.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 21.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 21.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 9.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -335.8% | 26.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -66.0% | 26.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -54.0% | 8.3% |
| Q4 25 | 20.4% | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 74.0% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.9% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.8% | 2.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.81× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.52× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.48× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.78× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.43× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.85× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.62× | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.35× | 0.71× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CLSK
Segment breakdown not available.
CSW
| Contractor Solutions Segment | $166.3M | 71% |
| Specialized Reliability Solutions Segment | $38.2M | 16% |
| Engineered Building Solutions Segment | $28.5M | 12% |
