vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CLEANSPARK, INC. (CLSK) and PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (PCOR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($349.1M vs $181.2M, roughly 1.9× CLEANSPARK, INC.). PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. runs the higher net margin — -10.8% vs -209.0%, a 198.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.6% vs 11.6%). PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($109.2M vs $-198.1M). Over the past eight quarters, CLEANSPARK, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (106.4% CAGR vs 13.8%).
CleanSpark, Inc. is a U.S.-headquartered sustainable technology company operating two core business segments: low-carbon Bitcoin mining powered primarily by renewable and stranded energy resources, and end-to-end microgrid design, deployment, and operation services for commercial, industrial, and public sector clients across North America.
Procore Technologies is an American construction management software as a service company founded in 2002, with headquarters in Carpinteria, California. Procore hosts a platform to connect those involved in the construction industry on a global platform. The software allows for the creation of simplified workflows and displays a consolidated view of construction products that includes the tracking of tasks, management of project workflows, and scheduling.
CLSK vs PCOR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $181.2M | $349.1M |
| Net Profit | $-378.7M | $-37.6M |
| Gross Margin | 47.2% | 80.1% |
| Operating Margin | -174.7% | -12.3% |
| Net Margin | -209.0% | -10.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.6% | 15.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -253.5% | 39.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.25 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $181.2M | $349.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $338.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $323.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $310.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $302.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $89.3M | $295.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $104.1M | $284.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $111.8M | $269.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-378.7M | $-37.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-9.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-21.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-33.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-62.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-62.2M | $-26.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-236.2M | $-6.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $126.7M | $-11.0M |
| Q4 25 | 47.2% | 80.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 79.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 79.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 79.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 81.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 36.0% | 81.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 56.6% | 83.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 69.3% | 83.0% |
| Q4 25 | -174.7% | -12.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -4.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -9.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -11.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -21.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -73.5% | -12.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -239.2% | -5.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -7.0% |
| Q4 25 | -209.0% | -10.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -2.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -6.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -10.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -20.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -69.6% | -8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -226.9% | -2.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 113.4% | -4.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.25 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.14 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.22 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.42 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.18 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.04 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.08 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $458.1M | $768.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.8B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.4B | $1.3B |
| Total Assets | $3.3B | $2.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.29× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $458.1M | $768.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $684.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $620.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $566.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $775.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $121.2M | $756.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $126.1M | $735.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $744.6M |
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | $3.3B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | $1.9B |
| Q4 25 | 1.29× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.00× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-161.1M | $114.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-198.1M | $109.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -109.3% | 31.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 20.4% | 1.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-626.9M | $282.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-161.1M | $114.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $88.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $30.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $66.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $29.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-233.7M | $39.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-58.4M | $58.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-44.8M | $69.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-198.1M | $109.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $83.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $27.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $62.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $17.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-299.8M | $35.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-68.7M | $56.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-60.3M | $67.1M |
| Q4 25 | -109.3% | 31.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 24.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 8.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 20.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -335.8% | 12.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -66.0% | 20.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -54.0% | 24.9% |
| Q4 25 | 20.4% | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 74.0% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.9% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.8% | 0.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.35× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CLSK
Segment breakdown not available.
PCOR
| US | $298.3M | 85% |
| Non Us | $50.9M | 15% |