vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CLEANSPARK, INC. (CLSK) and PagerDuty, Inc. (PD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CLEANSPARK, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($181.2M vs $124.5M, roughly 1.5× PagerDuty, Inc.). PagerDuty, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 129.7% vs -209.0%, a 338.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CLEANSPARK, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.6% vs 4.7%). PagerDuty, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($24.1M vs $-198.1M). Over the past eight quarters, CLEANSPARK, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (106.4% CAGR vs 5.9%).
CleanSpark, Inc. is a U.S.-headquartered sustainable technology company operating two core business segments: low-carbon Bitcoin mining powered primarily by renewable and stranded energy resources, and end-to-end microgrid design, deployment, and operation services for commercial, industrial, and public sector clients across North America.
PagerDuty, Inc. is an American cloud computing company specializing in a SaaS incident management platform for IT operations departments.
CLSK vs PD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $181.2M | $124.5M |
| Net Profit | $-378.7M | $161.6M |
| Gross Margin | 47.2% | 85.3% |
| Operating Margin | -174.7% | 6.5% |
| Net Margin | -209.0% | 129.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.6% | 4.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -253.5% | 2827.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $1.69 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $181.2M | $124.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $123.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $119.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $121.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $118.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $89.3M | $115.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $104.1M | $111.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $111.8M | $111.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-378.7M | $161.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $9.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-7.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-8.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-5.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-62.2M | $-10.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-236.2M | $-17.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $126.7M | $-28.2M |
| Q4 25 | 47.2% | 85.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 84.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 84.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 83.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 83.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 36.0% | 82.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 56.6% | 82.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 69.3% | 81.7% |
| Q4 25 | -174.7% | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -8.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -9.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -8.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -73.5% | -13.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -239.2% | -19.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -30.1% |
| Q4 25 | -209.0% | 129.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -6.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -7.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -5.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -69.6% | -9.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -226.9% | -15.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 113.4% | -25.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.69 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.10 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.07 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.12 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.07 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.14 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.26 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.34 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $458.1M | $547.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.8B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.4B | $320.5M |
| Total Assets | $3.3B | $1.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.29× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $458.1M | $547.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $567.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $597.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $570.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $542.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $121.2M | $599.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $126.1M | $592.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $571.2M |
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $484.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.1M | $489.5M |
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $320.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $180.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $145.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $129.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $111.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $164.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $174.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | $171.6M |
| Q4 25 | $3.3B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $891.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $926.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $927.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $866.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $916.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $924.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | $925.3M |
| Q4 25 | 1.29× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.73× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.00× | 2.85× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-161.1M | $24.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-198.1M | $24.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -109.3% | 19.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 20.4% | 0.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.15× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-626.9M | $117.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-161.1M | $24.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $34.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $30.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $31.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $22.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-233.7M | $35.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-58.4M | $28.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-44.8M | $22.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-198.1M | $24.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $33.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $30.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $30.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $21.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-299.8M | $35.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-68.7M | $28.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-60.3M | $21.2M |
| Q4 25 | -109.3% | 19.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 26.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 25.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 24.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 18.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -335.8% | 30.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -66.0% | 25.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -54.0% | 19.1% |
| Q4 25 | 20.4% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 74.0% | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.9% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.8% | 0.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.15× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.55× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.35× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CLSK
Segment breakdown not available.
PD
| US | $88.8M | 71% |
| Non Us | $35.7M | 29% |
