vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CLEANSPARK, INC. (CLSK) and Porch Group, Inc. (PRCH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CLEANSPARK, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($181.2M vs $121.1M, roughly 1.5× Porch Group, Inc.). Porch Group, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -3.9% vs -209.0%, a 205.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Porch Group, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (100.0% vs 11.6%). Over the past eight quarters, CLEANSPARK, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (106.4% CAGR vs 26.4%).
CleanSpark, Inc. is a U.S.-headquartered sustainable technology company operating two core business segments: low-carbon Bitcoin mining powered primarily by renewable and stranded energy resources, and end-to-end microgrid design, deployment, and operation services for commercial, industrial, and public sector clients across North America.
Porch is a website that tries to connect homeowners with local home improvement contractors. The site features advice articles, cost guide, and online booking for over 160 home projects.
CLSK vs PRCH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $181.2M | $121.1M |
| Net Profit | $-378.7M | $-4.7M |
| Gross Margin | 47.2% | 52.7% |
| Operating Margin | -174.7% | 34.7% |
| Net Margin | -209.0% | -3.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.6% | 100.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -253.5% | 2.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.04 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $121.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $181.2M | $112.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $115.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $107.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $84.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $75.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $89.3M | $77.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $104.1M | $75.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-4.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-378.7M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-10.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $8.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $30.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-62.2M | $14.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-236.2M | $-64.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | 52.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 47.2% | 99.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 75.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 70.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 77.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 36.0% | 79.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 56.6% | 22.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 34.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | -174.7% | 14.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 14.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -1.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 33.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -73.5% | -3.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -239.2% | -69.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | -3.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | -209.0% | -3.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -9.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 9.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 40.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -69.6% | 18.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -226.9% | -84.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.04 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.00 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.10 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.00 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.07 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.34 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.12 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.65 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $458.1M | $68.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.8B | $391.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.4B | $26.3M |
| Total Assets | $3.3B | $806.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.29× | 14.87× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $68.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $458.1M | $57.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $85.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $79.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $70.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $191.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $121.2M | $238.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $126.1M | $308.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $391.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $392.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $387.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $394.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $409.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $403.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.2M | $399.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3M | $436.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | $26.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $-24.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-27.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-29.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-52.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-43.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $-77.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $-101.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $806.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.3B | $797.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $787.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $770.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $802.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $814.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $867.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $876.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | 14.87× | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.29× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.00× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-161.1M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-198.1M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -109.3% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 20.4% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-626.9M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-161.1M | $1.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $40.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $35.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-11.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-26.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-233.7M | $12.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-58.4M | $-26.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-198.1M | $1.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $40.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $35.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-11.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-26.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-299.8M | $12.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-68.7M | $-26.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -109.3% | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 35.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 33.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -13.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -35.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -335.8% | 15.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -66.0% | -34.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 20.4% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 74.0% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.9% | 0.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 13.79× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -1.33× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -0.87× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.86× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.