vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CLEANSPARK, INC. (CLSK) and Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. (SHLS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CLEANSPARK, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($181.2M vs $148.3M, roughly 1.2× Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.). Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 5.5% vs -209.0%, a 214.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (38.6% vs 11.6%). Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-11.3M vs $-198.1M). Over the past eight quarters, CLEANSPARK, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (106.4% CAGR vs 27.8%).
CleanSpark, Inc. is a U.S.-headquartered sustainable technology company operating two core business segments: low-carbon Bitcoin mining powered primarily by renewable and stranded energy resources, and end-to-end microgrid design, deployment, and operation services for commercial, industrial, and public sector clients across North America.
Shoals Technologies Group is a leading provider of electrical balance of systems solutions for renewable energy and e-mobility. It supplies connectivity components for solar projects, energy storage systems and EV charging infrastructure, serving clients across North America, Europe and Asia-Pacific.
CLSK vs SHLS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $181.2M | $148.3M |
| Net Profit | $-378.7M | $8.1M |
| Gross Margin | 47.2% | 31.6% |
| Operating Margin | -174.7% | 11.7% |
| Net Margin | -209.0% | 5.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.6% | 38.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -253.5% | 3.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.05 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $181.2M | $148.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $135.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $110.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $80.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $107.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $89.3M | $102.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $104.1M | $99.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $111.8M | $90.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-378.7M | $8.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $11.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $13.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-282.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-62.2M | $-267.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-236.2M | $11.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $126.7M | $4.8M |
| Q4 25 | 47.2% | 31.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 37.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 37.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 35.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 37.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 36.0% | 24.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 56.6% | 40.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 69.3% | 40.2% |
| Q4 25 | -174.7% | 11.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 13.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 14.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 15.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -73.5% | 4.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -239.2% | 18.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 12.8% |
| Q4 25 | -209.0% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 8.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 12.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -69.6% | -0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -226.9% | 11.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 113.4% | 5.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.05 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.07 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.08 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.04 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.00 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.07 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.03 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $458.1M | $7.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.8B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.4B | $600.0M |
| Total Assets | $3.3B | $904.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.29× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $458.1M | $7.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $8.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $35.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $23.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $121.2M | $11.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $126.1M | $3.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $15.2M |
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $141.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $141.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.2M | $141.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3M | $146.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.1M | $168.8M |
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $600.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $589.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $575.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $558.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $556.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $545.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $544.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | $554.0M |
| Q4 25 | $3.3B | $904.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $851.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $795.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $788.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $793.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $801.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $788.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | $825.3M |
| Q4 25 | 1.29× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.25× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.25× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.00× | 0.26× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.00× | 0.27× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.00× | 0.30× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-161.1M | $-4.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-198.1M | $-11.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -109.3% | -7.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 20.4% | 4.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -0.50× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-626.9M | $-16.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-161.1M | $-4.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $19.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-13.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $15.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $14.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-233.7M | $15.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-58.4M | $37.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-44.8M | $12.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-198.1M | $-11.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $9.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-26.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $12.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $12.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-299.8M | $13.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-68.7M | $35.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-60.3M | $10.4M |
| Q4 25 | -109.3% | -7.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -23.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 15.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 11.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -335.8% | 13.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -66.0% | 36.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -54.0% | 11.4% |
| Q4 25 | 20.4% | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 7.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 11.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 74.0% | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.9% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.8% | 2.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | -0.50× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.63× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -1.00× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.79× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.21× | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.35× | 2.69× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CLSK
Segment breakdown not available.
SHLS
| System Solutions | $122.0M | 82% |
| Components | $26.3M | 18% |
