vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Catalyst Bancorp, Inc. (CLST) and Digital Brands Group, Inc. (DBGI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Catalyst Bancorp, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.7M vs $1.6M, roughly 1.7× Digital Brands Group, Inc.). Catalyst Bancorp, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 17.2% vs -1283.8%, a 1301.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Catalyst Bancorp, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (1.4% vs -25.1%). Over the past eight quarters, Catalyst Bancorp, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (12.6% CAGR vs -33.0%).
Catalyst Bancorp, Inc. is a U.S.-based financial holding company that operates community banking subsidiaries. It provides a full range of retail and commercial banking products including checking and savings accounts, small business loans, residential mortgages, personal lending, and wealth management services, primarily serving local regional markets across the U.S. with a focus on individual consumers and small business clients.
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. is an American manufacturer of home and security products, headquartered in Deerfield, Illinois. Its portfolio of businesses and brands includes Moen and the House of Rohl; outdoor living and security products from Therma-Tru, Larson, Fiberon, Master Lock and SentrySafe; and MasterBrand Cabinets. Fortune Brands is a Fortune 500 company and part of the S&P 400 Index. As of December 31, 2021, the company reported employing approximately 28,000 associates and pos...
CLST vs DBGI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.7M | $1.6M |
| Net Profit | $456.0K | $-20.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | -77.1% |
| Operating Margin | 20.8% | -1385.4% |
| Net Margin | 17.2% | -1283.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.4% | -25.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -27.2% | -283.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | $0.73 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.7M | $1.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8M | $1.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8M | $2.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.9M | $1.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5M | $2.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.2M | $2.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8M | $3.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1M | $3.6M |
| Q4 25 | $456.0K | $-20.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $489.0K | $-3.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $521.0K | $-2.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $586.0K | $-2.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $626.0K | $-5.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $447.0K | $-3.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $527.0K | $-3.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.7M | $-683.7K |
| Q4 25 | — | -77.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 42.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 31.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 46.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -35.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 46.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 45.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 48.1% |
| Q4 25 | 20.8% | -1385.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.7% | -201.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.5% | -88.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.7% | -106.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.2% | -230.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.6% | -112.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.0% | -67.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -284.6% | -6.3% |
| Q4 25 | 17.2% | -1283.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.7% | -208.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.5% | -94.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.1% | -111.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.3% | -250.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.2% | -145.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.7% | -103.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -224.0% | -19.1% |
| Q4 25 | $0.13 | $0.73 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.13 | $-1.18 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.14 | $-0.81 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.16 | $-0.92 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.13 | $132.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.11 | $-81.53 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.13 | $-104.18 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.15 | $-23.02 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $25.2M | $1.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $14.7M | $6.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $81.7M | $8.8M |
| Total Assets | $282.9M | $44.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.18× | 0.70× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $25.2M | $1.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $37.3M | $6.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $40.1M | $542.6K | ||
| Q1 25 | $40.3M | $2.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $44.3M | $164.4K | ||
| Q3 24 | $45.8M | $289.3K | ||
| Q2 24 | $75.5M | $92.8K | ||
| Q1 24 | $76.0M | $11.3K |
| Q4 25 | $14.7M | $6.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.6M | $6.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $29.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $29.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $81.7M | $8.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $81.6M | $16.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $80.8M | $7.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $80.6M | $6.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $80.2M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $81.7M | $19.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $81.0M | $2.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $81.3M | $3.0M |
| Q4 25 | $282.9M | $44.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $283.8M | $41.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $273.8M | $27.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $271.6M | $27.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $276.7M | $19.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $280.6M | $23.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $295.3M | $24.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $282.0M | $24.8M |
| Q4 25 | 0.18× | 0.70× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.18× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.12× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.36× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.37× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.36× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $3.3M | $-4.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $3.1M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 116.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 7.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 7.21× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $5.4M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.3M | $-4.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $912.0K | $-5.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2M | $-1.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $427.0K | $-4.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2M | $-2.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $896.0K | $-541.6K | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4M | $-1.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $247.0K | $-1.2M |
| Q4 25 | $3.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $827.0K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $361.0K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $771.0K | $-541.6K | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2M | $-1.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $223.0K | $-1.3M |
| Q4 25 | 116.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 39.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 110.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.5% | -22.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 41.5% | -47.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.7% | -35.1% |
| Q4 25 | 7.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.0% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.0% | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.1% | 0.4% |
| Q4 25 | 7.21× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.87× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.21× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.73× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.07× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.00× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.64× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
