vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Clearwater Paper Corp (CLW) and Five9, Inc. (FIVN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Clearwater Paper Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($360.3M vs $300.3M, roughly 1.2× Five9, Inc.). On growth, Five9, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.8% vs -4.7%). Over the past eight quarters, Five9, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (10.3% CAGR vs 2.3%).
Clearwater Paper Corporation is an American pulp and paperboard manufacturer. The company was created on December 9, 2008, via a spin-off from Potlatch Corporation and is headquartered in Spokane, Washington.
Five9, Inc. is a leading global provider of cloud-native contact center software and solutions. It serves enterprises of all sizes across retail, healthcare, financial services, and technology sectors, offering omnichannel customer engagement tools, AI-powered automation, workforce management, and analytics to boost customer experience and operational efficiency.
CLW vs FIVN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $360.3M | $300.3M |
| Net Profit | $-12.8M | — |
| Gross Margin | -0.2% | 55.4% |
| Operating Margin | — | 6.6% |
| Net Margin | -3.6% | — |
| Revenue YoY | -4.7% | 7.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -103.2% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.22 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $360.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $386.4M | $300.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $399.0M | $285.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $391.8M | $283.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $378.2M | $279.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $387.1M | $278.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $393.3M | $264.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $344.4M | $252.1M |
| Q1 26 | $-12.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $38.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-53.3M | $18.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7M | $1.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-6.3M | $576.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $199.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.8M | $-4.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-25.8M | $-12.8M |
| Q1 26 | -0.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.5% | 55.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.7% | 55.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.0% | 54.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.7% | 55.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.8% | 56.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.7% | 53.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.6% | 53.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.9% | 6.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -13.9% | 5.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.5% | -0.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.1% | -1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.0% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.3% | -5.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -13.6% | -7.7% |
| Q1 26 | -3.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -13.4% | 6.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.7% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.7% | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 51.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.5% | -1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.5% | -5.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.36 | $0.22 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.30 | $0.21 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.17 | $0.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.38 | $0.01 | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.87 | $0.16 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.35 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.55 | $-0.17 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $36.5M | $232.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $361.1M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $813.8M | $785.8M |
| Total Assets | $1.6B | $1.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.44× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $36.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $30.7M | $232.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $34.4M | $193.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $46.7M | $205.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.0M | $370.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $79.6M | $362.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $35.5M | $291.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $39.6M | $175.7M |
| Q1 26 | $361.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $346.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $337.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $330.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $283.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | — |
| Q1 26 | $813.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $825.3M | $785.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $783.0M | $775.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $836.8M | $717.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $836.6M | $664.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $854.6M | $622.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $664.6M | $565.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $658.6M | $525.9M |
| Q1 26 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5B | $1.9B |
| Q1 26 | 0.44× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.42× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.43× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.39× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.33× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.73× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.74× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $83.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $77.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 25.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $201.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.0M | $83.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $34.0M | $59.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-28.2M | $35.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5M | $48.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-35.1M | $49.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.2M | $41.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.1M | $19.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-9.9M | $77.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.7M | $48.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-51.1M | $31.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-31.2M | $43.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-68.1M | $40.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-30.8M | $26.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0M | $13.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -2.6% | 25.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.9% | 17.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -13.0% | 11.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.2% | 15.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -17.6% | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -7.8% | 10.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.9% | 5.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.9% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.6% | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.8% | 1.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.6% | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.5% | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.0% | 5.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.3% | 2.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.13× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.29× | ||
| Q2 25 | -10.44× | 30.38× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 84.00× | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.18× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.79× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.