vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE (CM) and Danaher Corporation (DHR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($6.1B vs $6.0B, roughly 1.0× Danaher Corporation). CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE runs the higher net margin — 36.9% vs 17.3%, a 19.6% gap on every dollar of revenue.
The Imperial Bank of Canada was a Canadian bank that operated from 1873 to 1961. In 1961, Imperial merged with the Canadian Bank of Commerce to become the Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce.
Danaher CorporationDHREarnings & Financial Report
Danaher Corporation is an American healthcare company headquartered in Washington, D.C.. It develops products used for advances in biotechnology, life sciences, and diagnostics. The company operates three divisions: biotechnology, which develops products for the development of therapeutics; life sciences, which develops products to identify causes of disease, new therapies, and to test and manufacture new drugs, vaccines and gene editing technologies; and diagnostics, which develops instruments,...
CM vs DHR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $6.1B | $6.0B |
| Net Profit | $2.3B | $1.0B |
| Gross Margin | — | 60.3% |
| Operating Margin | — | 22.6% |
| Net Margin | 36.9% | 17.3% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 3.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 7.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $1.45 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $6.1B | $6.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $6.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.3B | $6.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.1B | $5.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $6.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $5.7B |
| Q1 26 | $2.3B | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $908.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $555.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $954.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $818.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $907.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 60.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 58.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 58.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 59.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 61.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 59.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 58.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 59.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 22.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 22.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 19.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 12.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 22.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 21.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 16.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 20.3% |
| Q1 26 | 36.9% | 17.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 17.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 28.9% | 15.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.6% | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 16.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 16.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 14.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 15.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.45 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.69 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.27 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.77 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.32 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.50 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.12 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.22 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $8.0B | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $47.9B | — |
| Total Assets | $826.8B | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $8.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.9B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $18.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $16.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $17.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $16.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $16.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $17.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $17.0B |
| Q1 26 | $47.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $52.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $45.9B | $51.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $45.2B | $52.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $50.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $49.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $51.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $49.9B |
| Q1 26 | $826.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $83.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $804.6B | $79.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $795.8B | $81.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $79.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $77.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $80.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $78.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.35× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.33× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.33× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.32× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.32× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.34× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.34× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.6B | $1.3B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 4.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.69× | 1.28× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $-1.6B | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.3B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $667.2M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 25.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 22.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 18.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 18.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 23.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 21.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 19.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 5.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.0% |
| Q1 26 | -0.69× | 1.28× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.77× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.80× | 1.83× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.46× | 2.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.36× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.86× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.85× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.56× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
