vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Cambium Networks Corp (CMBM) and GLADSTONE COMMERCIAL CORP (GOOD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
GLADSTONE COMMERCIAL CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($41.9M vs $40.3M, roughly 1.0× Cambium Networks Corp). GLADSTONE COMMERCIAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 16.6% vs -17.9%, a 34.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, GLADSTONE COMMERCIAL CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-3.6% vs -23.2%). Over the past eight quarters, GLADSTONE COMMERCIAL CORP's revenue compounded faster (6.3% CAGR vs -27.2%).
Cambium Networks Corporation is an American manufacturer of wireless telecommunications equipment, including Enterprise WiFi, Network switch, Internet of Things, and fixed wireless broadband and Wi-Fi for enterprises products for Internet access. Publicly traded on the NASDAQ stock exchange, it spun out of Motorola in October 2011.
Gladstone Commercial Corp is a publicly traded US real estate investment trust focused on acquiring, owning, and operating diversified industrial and commercial properties. It offers long-term net lease agreements to tenants across manufacturing, logistics, healthcare and professional services sectors, mainly serving small to mid-sized business clients.
CMBM vs GOOD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2024 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $40.3M | $41.9M |
| Net Profit | $-7.2M | $7.0M |
| Gross Margin | 36.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | -28.4% | 160.2% |
| Net Margin | -17.9% | 16.6% |
| Revenue YoY | -23.2% | -3.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 71.0% | 29.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.26 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $41.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $43.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $40.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $39.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $37.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $40.3M | $37.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $44.7M | $39.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $45.2M | $37.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $7.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $5.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-7.2M | $7.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-34.5M | $11.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-14.2M | $1.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 43.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 160.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -28.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -69.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -27.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 16.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 12.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 10.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 11.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 13.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -17.9% | 19.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -77.3% | 29.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -31.5% | 4.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.05 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.03 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.04 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.26 | $0.10 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.22 | $0.20 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.51 | $-0.04 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $67.6M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-3.2M | — |
| Total Assets | $173.7M | $1.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $10.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $18.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $11.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $10.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $11.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $10.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $10.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $843.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $843.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $794.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $740.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $67.6M | $693.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $67.6M | $692.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $68.9M | $722.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $171.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $184.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $177.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $183.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.2M | $171.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9M | $168.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $34.1M | $145.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $173.7M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $194.3M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $221.1M | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 4.91× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.56× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.48× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.04× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.05× | ||
| Q3 24 | 36.12× | 4.10× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.02× | 4.96× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-10.4M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-10.8M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -26.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-21.4M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $88.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $18.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $35.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $17.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-10.4M | $57.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.9M | $5.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4M | $13.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-10.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $87.0K | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -26.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 16.38× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.57× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 7.74× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.44× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.93× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.47× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 8.44× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CMBM
| Enterprise | $16.6M | 41% |
| Point To Multi Point | $16.4M | 41% |
| Other | $5.8M | 14% |
GOOD
Segment breakdown not available.