vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Cambium Networks Corp (CMBM) and KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc. (KREF). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Cambium Networks Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($40.3M vs $25.8M, roughly 1.6× KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc.). Cambium Networks Corp runs the higher net margin — -17.9% vs -101.7%, a 83.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Cambium Networks Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-23.2% vs -26.6%). Over the past eight quarters, KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-18.8% CAGR vs -27.2%).
Cambium Networks Corporation is an American manufacturer of wireless telecommunications equipment, including Enterprise WiFi, Network switch, Internet of Things, and fixed wireless broadband and Wi-Fi for enterprises products for Internet access. Publicly traded on the NASDAQ stock exchange, it spun out of Motorola in October 2011.
KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc. is a specialized real estate finance firm sponsored by global investment firm KKR. It primarily originates, acquires, and manages a portfolio of senior secured commercial real estate loans, mostly backed by high-quality institutional commercial properties across the United States, delivering stable risk-adjusted returns to investors via interest income from its diversified assets.
CMBM vs KREF — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2024 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $40.3M | $25.8M |
| Net Profit | $-7.2M | $-26.2M |
| Gross Margin | 36.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | -28.4% | -105.1% |
| Net Margin | -17.9% | -101.7% |
| Revenue YoY | -23.2% | -26.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 71.0% | -229.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.26 | $-0.49 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $25.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $25.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $30.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $31.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $40.3M | $35.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $44.7M | $37.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $45.2M | $40.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $47.1M | $39.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-26.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $13.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-29.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-4.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-7.2M | $20.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-34.5M | $-7.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-14.2M | $25.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-18.4M | $-3.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 43.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 29.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -105.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 50.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -101.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -18.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -28.4% | 55.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -69.6% | -19.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -27.2% | 63.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -33.1% | -8.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | -101.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 54.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -98.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -15.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -17.9% | 57.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -77.3% | -20.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -31.5% | 63.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -39.2% | -7.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.49 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.53 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.15 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.26 | $0.22 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.22 | $-0.19 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.51 | $0.29 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.66 | $-0.13 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $84.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $67.6M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-3.2M | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $173.7M | $6.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $84.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $204.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $107.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $106.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $104.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $108.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $107.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $106.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $67.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $67.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $68.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $63.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.2M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $34.1M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $45.0M | $1.4B |
| Q4 25 | — | $6.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $6.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $6.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $173.7M | $6.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $194.3M | $6.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $221.1M | $7.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $219.8M | $7.3B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 36.12× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.02× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.42× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-10.4M | $72.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-10.8M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -26.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-21.4M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $72.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $18.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $21.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $15.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-10.4M | $132.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.9M | $49.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4M | $30.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-15.9M | $34.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-10.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $87.0K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-17.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -26.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -37.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.34× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.54× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.19× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CMBM
| Enterprise | $16.6M | 41% |
| Point To Multi Point | $16.4M | 41% |
| Other | $5.8M | 14% |
KREF
Segment breakdown not available.