vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CMB.TECH NV (CMBT) and Dolby Laboratories, Inc. (DLB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CMB.TECH NV is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($592.8M vs $346.7M, roughly 1.7× Dolby Laboratories, Inc.). CMB.TECH NV runs the higher net margin — 32.3% vs 15.4%, a 16.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Dolby Laboratories, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-2.9% vs -34.6%).
CMB.TECH, before October 2024 known as Euronav, is a crude oil tanker transport company, which consists of VLCCs, Suezmaxes and FSOs.
Dolby Laboratories, Inc. is an American technology corporation specializing in audio noise reduction, audio encoding/compression, spatial audio, and high-dynamic-range television (HDR) imaging. Dolby licenses its technologies to consumer electronics manufacturers.
CMBT vs DLB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2024 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $592.8M | $346.7M |
| Net Profit | $191.2M | $53.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | 87.5% |
| Operating Margin | 46.4% | 17.9% |
| Net Margin | 32.3% | 15.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -34.6% | -2.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -63.3% | -21.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.01 | $0.55 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $346.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $346.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $307.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $315.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $369.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $592.8M | $357.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $304.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $288.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | $53.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $53.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $49.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $46.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $91.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $191.2M | $67.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $58.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $38.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | 87.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 87.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 87.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 86.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 90.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 88.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 88.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 87.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 17.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 17.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 15.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 29.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 46.4% | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 15.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 12.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 15.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 15.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 14.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 24.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.3% | 19.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 19.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 13.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.55 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.55 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.50 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.48 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.94 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.01 | $0.70 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.59 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.40 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $38.9M | $644.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.6B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $2.6B |
| Total Assets | $3.9B | $3.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.20× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $644.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $644.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $702.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $699.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $626.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $38.9M | $520.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $482.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $869.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.9B | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.20× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $204.4M | $54.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.07× | 1.03× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $54.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $54.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $472.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $67.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $174.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $204.4M | $106.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $327.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $21.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $50.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $435.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $61.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $168.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $100.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $297.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $13.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 142.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 19.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 45.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 97.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 11.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.03× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.03× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 9.57× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.47× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.91× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.07× | 1.57× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.59× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.55× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CMBT
Segment breakdown not available.
DLB
| Licensing | $319.8M | 92% |
| Products and services | $26.9M | 8% |
