vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CMB.TECH NV (CMBT) and PROSPERITY BANCSHARES INC (PB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CMB.TECH NV is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($592.8M vs $367.6M, roughly 1.6× PROSPERITY BANCSHARES INC). CMB.TECH NV runs the higher net margin — 32.3% vs 31.6%, a 0.6% gap on every dollar of revenue.
CMB.TECH, before October 2024 known as Euronav, is a crude oil tanker transport company, which consists of VLCCs, Suezmaxes and FSOs.
Prosperity Bancshares, Inc. is a bank holding company headquartered in Houston, Texas with operations in Texas and central Oklahoma. As of December 31, 2019, the company operated 285 branches: 65 in the Houston area, including The Woodlands, Texas; 30 in South Texas, including Corpus Christi, Texas and Victoria, Texas; 75 in the Dallas–Fort Worth metroplex; 22 in East Texas; 29 in Central Texas, including Austin, Texas and San Antonio; 34 in West Texas, including Lubbock, Texas, Midland–Odess...
CMBT vs PB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2024 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $592.8M | $367.6M |
| Net Profit | $191.2M | $116.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 46.4% | — |
| Net Margin | 32.3% | 31.6% |
| Revenue YoY | -34.6% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -63.3% | -10.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.01 | $1.16 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $367.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $275.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $273.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $267.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $265.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $592.8M | $267.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $261.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $258.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | $116.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $139.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $137.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $135.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $130.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $191.2M | $130.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $127.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $111.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 65.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 64.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 64.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 62.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 46.4% | 62.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 62.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 55.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | 31.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 50.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 50.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 50.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 49.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.3% | 48.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 48.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 43.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.16 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.48 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.45 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.42 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.37 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.01 | $1.36 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.34 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.17 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $38.9M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.6B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $8.2B |
| Total Assets | $3.9B | $43.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.20× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $38.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $8.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $7.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $7.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $7.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $7.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $7.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $7.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $43.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $38.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $38.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $38.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $38.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.9B | $39.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $40.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $39.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.20× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $204.4M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.07× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $78.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $194.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $98.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $178.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $204.4M | $-205.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $274.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $216.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $68.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $185.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $91.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $171.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-210.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $270.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $211.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 24.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 67.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 34.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 64.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -78.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 103.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 81.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.56× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.42× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.73× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.37× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.07× | -1.58× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.16× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.94× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CMBT
Segment breakdown not available.
PB
| Net Interest Income | $321.1M | 87% |
| Noninterest Income | $46.5M | 13% |
