vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of COMMERCIAL METALS Co (CMC) and DANA Inc (DAN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
COMMERCIAL METALS Co is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.1B vs $1.3B, roughly 1.6× DANA Inc). COMMERCIAL METALS Co runs the higher net margin — 8.4% vs -3.9%, a 12.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, COMMERCIAL METALS Co posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.0% vs -44.5%). DANA Inc produced more free cash flow last quarter ($345.0M vs $78.8M). Over the past eight quarters, COMMERCIAL METALS Co's revenue compounded faster (7.1% CAGR vs -31.2%).
Commercial Metals Company (CMC) is a company that produces rebar and related construction materials headquartered in Irving, Texas. Along with Nucor, it is one of two primary suppliers of steel used to reinforce concrete in buildings, bridges, roads, and infrastructure in the U.S. The company also owns Tensar, a producer of foundation systems used for the construction of roadways, public infrastructure, and industrial facilities.
Dana Incorporated is an American supplier of axles, driveshafts, and electrodynamic, thermal, sealing, and digital equipment for conventional, hybrid, and electric-powered vehicles. The company's products and services are aimed at the light vehicle and commercial vehicle equipment markets. Founded in 1904 and based in Maumee, Ohio, the company employs nearly 28,000 people in 33 countries. In 2022, Dana generated sales of $10.2 billion. The company is included in the Fortune 500.
CMC vs DAN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.1B | $1.3B |
| Net Profit | $177.3M | $-50.0M |
| Gross Margin | 19.2% | 6.0% |
| Operating Margin | 8.6% | -0.2% |
| Net Margin | 8.4% | -3.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.0% | -44.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 200.9% | 37.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.58 | $-0.36 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $2.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $2.7B |
| Q4 25 | $177.3M | $-50.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $151.8M | $83.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $83.1M | $27.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.5M | $25.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-175.7M | $-80.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $103.9M | $4.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.4M | $16.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $85.8M | $3.0M |
| Q4 25 | 19.2% | 6.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.6% | 8.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.8% | 7.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.5% | 9.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.1% | 5.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.2% | 9.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.4% | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.0% | 8.9% |
| Q4 25 | 8.6% | -0.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.1% | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.4% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.1% | 3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -12.1% | -1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.7% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.7% | 3.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.3% | 2.6% |
| Q4 25 | 8.4% | -3.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.2% | 4.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.1% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.5% | 1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -9.2% | -3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.2% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.7% | 0.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.6% | 0.1% |
| Q4 25 | $1.58 | $-0.36 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.33 | $0.64 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.73 | $0.19 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.22 | $0.17 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.54 | $-0.55 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.90 | $0.03 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.02 | $0.11 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.73 | $0.02 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.0B | $469.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.3B | $2.6B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.3B | $840.0M |
| Total Assets | $9.2B | $7.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.77× | 3.05× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | $469.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $414.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $893.0M | $486.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $758.4M | $507.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $856.1M | $494.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $857.9M | $419.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $698.3M | $419.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $638.3M | $351.0M |
| Q4 25 | $3.3B | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $2.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | $2.6B |
| Q4 25 | $4.3B | $840.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.0B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.0B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.3B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.3B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.2B | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | $9.2B | $7.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.2B | $8.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.0B | $8.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.7B | $7.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.8B | $7.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.8B | $7.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.7B | $7.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.7B | $7.9B |
| Q4 25 | 0.77× | 3.05× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.31× | 2.35× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.32× | 2.13× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.29× | 1.76× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.29× | 1.79× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.27× | 1.65× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.27× | 1.62× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.27× | 1.68× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $204.2M | $406.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $78.8M | $345.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 3.7% | 26.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.9% | 4.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.15× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $296.2M | $298.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $204.2M | $406.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $315.2M | $111.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $154.4M | $32.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.4M | $-37.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $213.0M | $302.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $351.8M | $35.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $197.9M | $215.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $89.0M | $-102.0M |
| Q4 25 | $78.8M | $345.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $206.3M | $62.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $65.0M | $3.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-53.8M | $-112.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $94.8M | $149.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $270.3M | $-11.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $115.8M | $104.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.8M | $-172.0M |
| Q4 25 | 3.7% | 26.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.8% | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.2% | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.1% | -4.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.0% | 6.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.5% | -0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.6% | 3.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.3% | -6.3% |
| Q4 25 | 5.9% | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.2% | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.4% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.9% | 3.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.2% | 6.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.1% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | 4.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.1% | 2.6% |
| Q4 25 | 1.15× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.08× | 1.34× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.86× | 1.19× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.27× | -1.48× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.39× | 8.75× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.66× | 13.44× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.04× | -34.00× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CMC
| Steel Products | $670.8M | 32% |
| Downstream Products | $505.3M | 24% |
| Construction Solutions Group | $314.4M | 15% |
| Europe Steel Group | $200.0M | 9% |
| Precast Products | $141.6M | 7% |
| Construction Products | $78.4M | 4% |
| Foley Products Company LLC | $75.1M | 4% |
| Concrete Pipe And Precast LLC | $69.4M | 3% |
| Ground Stabilization Products | $49.9M | 2% |
DAN
| Light Vehicle Segment | $912.0M | 70% |
| Commercial Vehicle Segment | $218.0M | 17% |
| Other | $166.0M | 13% |
