vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of COMMERCIAL METALS Co (CMC) and LESAKA TECHNOLOGIES INC (LSAK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
LESAKA TECHNOLOGIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.0B vs $2.1B, roughly 1.4× COMMERCIAL METALS Co). COMMERCIAL METALS Co runs the higher net margin — 8.4% vs 0.0%, a 8.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, COMMERCIAL METALS Co posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.0% vs 0.2%). Over the past eight quarters, LESAKA TECHNOLOGIES INC's revenue compounded faster (341.6% CAGR vs 7.1%).
Commercial Metals Company (CMC) is a company that produces rebar and related construction materials headquartered in Irving, Texas. Along with Nucor, it is one of two primary suppliers of steel used to reinforce concrete in buildings, bridges, roads, and infrastructure in the U.S. The company also owns Tensar, a producer of foundation systems used for the construction of roadways, public infrastructure, and industrial facilities.
Lesaka Technologies is a South-African financial technology company that is listed on the NASDAQ and Johannesburg Stock Exchange. Lesaka’s primary focus is on financial inclusion, offering financial services to previously underserved communities and merchants.
CMC vs LSAK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2027
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.1B | $3.0B |
| Net Profit | $177.3M | $437.0K |
| Gross Margin | 19.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | 8.6% | 2.2% |
| Net Margin | 8.4% | 0.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.0% | 0.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 200.9% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.58 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 26 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 26 | — | $3.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $178.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $171.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | $168.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $161.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $176.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $153.6M |
| Q3 26 | — | $437.0K | ||
| Q2 26 | — | $3.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $177.3M | $3.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $151.8M | $-4.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $83.1M | $-28.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.5M | $-22.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-175.7M | $-32.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $103.9M | $-4.5M |
| Q3 26 | — | — | ||
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 19.2% | 31.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.6% | 30.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.8% | 28.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.5% | 27.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.1% | 25.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.2% | 22.6% |
| Q3 26 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 26 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.6% | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.1% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.4% | -16.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.1% | 0.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -12.1% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.7% | -0.0% |
| Q3 26 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 26 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.4% | 2.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.2% | -2.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.1% | -16.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.5% | -13.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -9.2% | -18.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.2% | -3.0% |
| Q3 26 | — | — | ||
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.58 | $0.04 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.33 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.73 | $-0.40 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.22 | $-0.27 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.54 | $-0.40 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.90 | $-0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.0B | $1.5B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.3B | $3.2B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.3B | — |
| Total Assets | $9.2B | $11.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.77× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 26 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 26 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | $69.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $72.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $893.0M | $76.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $758.4M | $71.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $856.1M | $60.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $857.9M | $49.7M |
| Q3 26 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 26 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.3B | $216.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $208.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $200.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $194.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $148.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $148.5M |
| Q3 26 | — | — | ||
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.3B | $180.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.2B | $170.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1B | $161.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.0B | $185.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.0B | $193.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.3B | $184.2M |
| Q3 26 | — | $11.5B | ||
| Q2 26 | — | $11.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.2B | $704.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.2B | $652.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.0B | $653.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.7B | $649.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.8B | $640.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.8B | $551.9M |
| Q3 26 | — | — | ||
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.77× | 1.20× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.31× | 1.22× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.32× | 1.24× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.29× | 1.05× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.29× | 0.77× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.27× | 0.81× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $204.2M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $78.8M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 3.7% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.9% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.15× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $296.2M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 26 | — | — | ||
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $204.2M | $-10.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $315.2M | $8.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $154.4M | $-9.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.4M | $10.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $213.0M | $-9.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $351.8M | $-4.1M |
| Q3 26 | — | — | ||
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $78.8M | $-14.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $206.3M | $4.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $65.0M | $-13.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-53.8M | $7.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $94.8M | $-15.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $270.3M | $-8.1M |
| Q3 26 | — | — | ||
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.7% | -8.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.8% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.2% | -7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.1% | 4.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.0% | -8.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.5% | -5.3% |
| Q3 26 | — | — | ||
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.9% | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.2% | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.4% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.9% | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.2% | 3.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.1% | 2.6% |
| Q3 26 | — | — | ||
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.15× | -2.99× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.08× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.86× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.27× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.39× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CMC
| Steel Products | $670.8M | 32% |
| Downstream Products | $505.3M | 24% |
| Construction Solutions Group | $314.4M | 15% |
| Europe Steel Group | $200.0M | 9% |
| Precast Products | $141.6M | 7% |
| Construction Products | $78.4M | 4% |
| Foley Products Company LLC | $75.1M | 4% |
| Concrete Pipe And Precast LLC | $69.4M | 3% |
| Ground Stabilization Products | $49.9M | 2% |
LSAK
Segment breakdown not available.
