vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of COMMERCIAL METALS Co (CMC) and Zimmer Biomet (ZBH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
COMMERCIAL METALS Co is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.1B vs $2.1B, roughly 1.0× Zimmer Biomet). Zimmer Biomet runs the higher net margin — 11.4% vs 8.4%, a 3.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, COMMERCIAL METALS Co posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.0% vs 9.3%). Zimmer Biomet produced more free cash flow last quarter ($245.9M vs $78.8M). Over the past eight quarters, COMMERCIAL METALS Co's revenue compounded faster (7.1% CAGR vs 3.7%).
Commercial Metals Company (CMC) is a company that produces rebar and related construction materials headquartered in Irving, Texas. Along with Nucor, it is one of two primary suppliers of steel used to reinforce concrete in buildings, bridges, roads, and infrastructure in the U.S. The company also owns Tensar, a producer of foundation systems used for the construction of roadways, public infrastructure, and industrial facilities.
Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. is a publicly traded American medical device company. It was founded in 1927 to produce aluminum splints. The firm is headquartered in Warsaw, Indiana, where it is part of the medical devices business cluster.
CMC vs ZBH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.1B | $2.1B |
| Net Profit | $177.3M | $238.3M |
| Gross Margin | 19.2% | 64.6% |
| Operating Margin | 8.6% | 17.9% |
| Net Margin | 8.4% | 11.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.0% | 9.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 200.9% | 30.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.58 | $1.22 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $1.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | $238.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $177.3M | $139.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $151.8M | $230.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $83.1M | $152.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.5M | $182.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-175.7M | $239.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $103.9M | $249.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.4M | $242.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | 64.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 19.2% | 64.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.6% | 72.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.8% | 71.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.5% | 71.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.1% | 71.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.2% | 70.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.4% | 71.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 17.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.6% | 6.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.1% | 17.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.4% | 14.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.1% | 15.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -12.1% | 19.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.7% | 15.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.7% | 18.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 11.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.4% | 6.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.2% | 11.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.1% | 7.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.5% | 9.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -9.2% | 11.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.2% | 13.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.7% | 12.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.22 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.58 | $0.71 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.33 | $1.16 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.73 | $0.77 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.22 | $0.91 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.54 | $1.18 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.90 | $1.23 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.02 | $1.18 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.0B | $424.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.3B | $7.5B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.3B | $12.7B |
| Total Assets | $9.2B | $22.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.77× | 0.59× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $424.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | $591.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $893.0M | $556.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $758.4M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $856.1M | $525.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $857.9M | $569.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $698.3M | $420.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $7.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $12.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.3B | $12.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.2B | $12.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1B | $12.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.0B | $12.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.0B | $12.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.3B | $12.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.3B | $12.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | $22.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.2B | $23.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.2B | $23.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.0B | $22.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.7B | $22.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.8B | $21.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.8B | $21.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.7B | $21.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.59× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.77× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.31× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.32× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.29× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.29× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.27× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.27× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $204.2M | $359.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $78.8M | $245.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 3.7% | 11.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.9% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.15× | 1.51× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $296.2M | $1.4B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $359.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $204.2M | $517.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $315.2M | $418.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $154.4M | $378.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.4M | $382.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $213.0M | $506.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $351.8M | $395.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $197.9M | $369.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $245.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $78.8M | $442.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $206.3M | $363.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $65.0M | $328.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-53.8M | $338.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $94.8M | $454.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $270.3M | $351.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $115.8M | $316.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | 11.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.7% | 19.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.8% | 18.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.2% | 15.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.1% | 17.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.0% | 22.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.5% | 19.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.6% | 16.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.9% | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.2% | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.4% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.9% | 2.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.2% | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.1% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | 2.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.51× | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.15× | 3.71× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.08× | 1.81× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.86× | 2.48× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.27× | 2.10× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.11× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.39× | 1.59× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.66× | 1.52× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CMC
| Steel Products | $670.8M | 32% |
| Downstream Products | $505.3M | 24% |
| Construction Solutions Group | $314.4M | 15% |
| Europe Steel Group | $200.0M | 9% |
| Precast Products | $141.6M | 7% |
| Construction Products | $78.4M | 4% |
| Foley Products Company LLC | $75.1M | 4% |
| Concrete Pipe And Precast LLC | $69.4M | 3% |
| Ground Stabilization Products | $49.9M | 2% |
ZBH
Segment breakdown not available.
