vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Caledonia Mining Corp Plc (CMCL) and Cryoport, Inc. (CYRX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Caledonia Mining Corp Plc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($46.9M vs $45.5M, roughly 1.0× Cryoport, Inc.). Caledonia Mining Corp Plc runs the higher net margin — 7.0% vs -17.5%, a 24.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Caledonia Mining Corp Plc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.8% vs 9.6%). Over the past eight quarters, Caledonia Mining Corp Plc's revenue compounded faster (17.1% CAGR vs 10.4%).
Hochschild Mining plc is a leading British-based silver and gold mining business operating in North, Central, and South America. It is headquartered in Lima, Peru, with a corporate office in London, is listed on the London Stock Exchange and is a constituent of the FTSE 250 Index. The main shareholder is the Peruvian businessman Eduardo Hochschild.
Cryoport, Inc. is a global provider of specialized temperature-controlled logistics and supply chain solutions focused on the life sciences, biopharmaceutical, and cell and gene therapy sectors. It partners with research institutions, biotech firms, and pharmaceutical manufacturers globally to support the safe transport of sensitive biological materials including clinical trial samples and advanced therapy products.
CMCL vs CYRX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2024 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $46.9M | $45.5M |
| Net Profit | $3.3M | $-8.0M |
| Gross Margin | 41.2% | 47.8% |
| Operating Margin | 18.6% | -17.0% |
| Net Margin | 7.0% | -17.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.8% | 9.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -33.3% | 57.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | $-0.19 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $45.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $44.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $45.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $41.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $41.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.9M | $38.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $50.1M | $39.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $38.5M | $37.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-8.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-6.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $105.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-12.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-18.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3M | $805.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.2M | $-78.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1M | $-18.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | 47.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 48.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 47.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 45.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 47.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 41.2% | 45.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 45.8% | 44.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 35.9% | 40.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | -17.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -22.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -21.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -23.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -30.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.6% | -34.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.2% | -196.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.8% | -46.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | -17.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -15.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 231.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -29.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -45.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.0% | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.3% | -196.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.4% | -50.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.19 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.18 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.05 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.28 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.42 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.13 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.42 | $-1.62 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.07 | $-0.43 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $7.2M | $411.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $231.0M | $502.6M |
| Total Assets | $339.7M | $765.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $411.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $421.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $426.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $244.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $250.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.2M | $259.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.4M | $414.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8M | $438.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $502.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $513.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $519.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $398.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $401.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $231.0M | $418.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $231.1M | $400.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $220.3M | $472.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $765.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $774.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $773.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $699.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $703.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $339.7M | $701.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $338.5M | $852.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $321.8M | $942.8M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $4.6M | $919.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-4.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -10.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 12.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.40× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-25.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $919.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-7.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-4.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-5.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.6M | $447.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.1M | $-8.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-3.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-4.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-1.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-11.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-7.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-10.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-3.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-11.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-7.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | -10.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -25.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -18.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -25.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -9.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -29.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -19.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 12.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 9.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 12.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 11.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 9.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 10.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.07× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.40× | 0.56× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.87× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
