vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Caledonia Mining Corp Plc (CMCL) and FRANKLIN STREET PROPERTIES CORP (FSP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Caledonia Mining Corp Plc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($46.9M vs $26.0M, roughly 1.8× FRANKLIN STREET PROPERTIES CORP). Caledonia Mining Corp Plc runs the higher net margin — 7.0% vs -28.1%, a 35.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Caledonia Mining Corp Plc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.8% vs -8.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Caledonia Mining Corp Plc's revenue compounded faster (17.1% CAGR vs -8.7%).
Hochschild Mining plc is a leading British-based silver and gold mining business operating in North, Central, and South America. It is headquartered in Lima, Peru, with a corporate office in London, is listed on the London Stock Exchange and is a constituent of the FTSE 250 Index. The main shareholder is the Peruvian businessman Eduardo Hochschild.
Franklin Street Properties Corp is a Massachusetts-based real estate investment trust (REIT) in the United States. It primarily invests in, owns, and operates high-quality office properties across major U.S. metropolitan markets, serving corporate tenants across various industry segments, and delivers stable long-term returns via rental income and strategic asset management.
CMCL vs FSP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2024 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $46.9M | $26.0M |
| Net Profit | $3.3M | $-7.3M |
| Gross Margin | 41.2% | 59.4% |
| Operating Margin | 18.6% | -27.9% |
| Net Margin | 7.0% | -28.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.8% | -8.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -33.3% | 14.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | $-0.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $26.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $27.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $26.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $27.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $28.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.9M | $29.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $50.1M | $30.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $38.5M | $31.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-7.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-8.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-7.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-21.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-8.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3M | $-15.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.2M | $-21.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1M | $-7.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 59.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 60.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 59.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 62.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 59.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 41.2% | 61.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 45.8% | 64.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 35.9% | 64.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | -27.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -30.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -29.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -78.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -29.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.6% | -52.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.2% | -68.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.8% | -24.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | -28.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -30.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -29.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -79.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -30.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.0% | -52.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.3% | -68.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.4% | -24.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.06 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.08 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.08 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.09 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.13 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.42 | $-0.20 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.07 | $-0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $7.2M | $30.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $231.0M | $607.0M |
| Total Assets | $339.7M | $892.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $30.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $31.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $29.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $30.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $41.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.2M | $40.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.4M | $30.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8M | $34.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $607.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $615.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $624.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $633.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $655.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $231.0M | $665.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $231.1M | $682.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $220.3M | $703.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $892.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $901.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $903.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $916.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $946.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $339.7M | $981.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $338.5M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $321.8M | $1.0B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $4.6M | $3.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-12.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -48.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 63.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.40× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-25.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $3.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $8.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-2.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-5.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $9.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.6M | $14.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.1M | $-648.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-7.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-12.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-5.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-9.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-16.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $8.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-5.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-15.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | -48.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 11.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -21.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -36.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -57.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 29.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -16.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -50.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 63.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 19.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 10.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 16.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 88.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 19.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 14.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 28.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.40× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.87× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
