vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Caledonia Mining Corp Plc (CMCL) and Hyperscale Data, Inc. (GPUS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Caledonia Mining Corp Plc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($46.9M vs $26.9M, roughly 1.7× Hyperscale Data, Inc.). Caledonia Mining Corp Plc runs the higher net margin — 7.0% vs -112.0%, a 119.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Hyperscale Data, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (38.4% vs 13.8%). Over the past eight quarters, Caledonia Mining Corp Plc's revenue compounded faster (17.1% CAGR vs -16.3%).
Hochschild Mining plc is a leading British-based silver and gold mining business operating in North, Central, and South America. It is headquartered in Lima, Peru, with a corporate office in London, is listed on the London Stock Exchange and is a constituent of the FTSE 250 Index. The main shareholder is the Peruvian businessman Eduardo Hochschild.
Hyperscale Data, Inc. provides GPU-accelerated computing infrastructure and cloud solutions tailored for AI development, big data processing, and high-performance computing workloads. It primarily serves AI startups, large technology firms, and cloud service providers across North America and the Asia-Pacific region, delivering scalable, high-efficiency computing resources to support complex data processing needs.
CMCL vs GPUS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2024 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $46.9M | $26.9M |
| Net Profit | $3.3M | $-30.1M |
| Gross Margin | 41.2% | 14.5% |
| Operating Margin | 18.6% | -117.8% |
| Net Margin | 7.0% | -112.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.8% | 38.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -33.3% | -6670.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $26.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $24.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $25.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $25.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $19.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.9M | $31.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $50.1M | $17.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $38.5M | $38.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-30.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-13.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-19.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-4.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-445.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3M | $-25.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.2M | $-33.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1M | $3.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 25.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 23.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 21.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 41.2% | 27.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 45.8% | -21.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 35.9% | 47.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | -117.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -57.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -39.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -25.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -46.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.6% | -79.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.2% | -151.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.8% | 9.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | -112.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -53.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -73.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -16.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -2.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.0% | -82.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.3% | -190.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.4% | 9.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.39 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-2.66 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-8.78 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.13 | $-24.82 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.42 | $-37.81 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.07 | $3.32 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $7.2M | $13.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $83.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $231.0M | $119.8M |
| Total Assets | $339.7M | $313.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.69× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $13.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $24.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.2M | $7.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.4M | $9.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8M | $18.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $83.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $80.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $88.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $92.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $96.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $104.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $106.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $30.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $119.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $55.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $8.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $231.0M | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $231.1M | $26.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $220.3M | $59.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $313.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $242.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $213.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $218.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $220.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $339.7M | $231.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $338.5M | $270.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $321.8M | $299.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.69× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.43× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 16.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 14.71× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 11.19× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 38.41× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.00× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.51× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $4.6M | $-37.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-56.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -208.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 68.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.40× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-87.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-37.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-17.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-3.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-4.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-9.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.6M | $3.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.1M | $-3.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-10.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-56.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-20.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-3.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-6.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-9.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-5.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-11.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | -208.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -84.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -13.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -27.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -47.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -33.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -30.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 68.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 11.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 11.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 12.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.40× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.87× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -2.75× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CMCL
Segment breakdown not available.
GPUS
| Transferred Over Time | $10.4M | 39% |
| Revenue From Mined Crypto Assets At Sentinum Owned And Operated Facilities | $5.8M | 21% |
| Hotel And Real Estate Operations | $4.8M | 18% |
| Other | $4.0M | 15% |
| Turn On Green | $2.0M | 7% |
