vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Caledonia Mining Corp Plc (CMCL) and GRAIL, Inc. (GRAL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Caledonia Mining Corp Plc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($46.9M vs $43.6M, roughly 1.1× GRAIL, Inc.). Caledonia Mining Corp Plc runs the higher net margin — 7.0% vs -227.5%, a 234.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, GRAIL, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.0% vs 13.8%). Over the past eight quarters, GRAIL, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (27.7% CAGR vs 17.1%).
Hochschild Mining plc is a leading British-based silver and gold mining business operating in North, Central, and South America. It is headquartered in Lima, Peru, with a corporate office in London, is listed on the London Stock Exchange and is a constituent of the FTSE 250 Index. The main shareholder is the Peruvian businessman Eduardo Hochschild.
GRAIL, Inc. is an American biotechnology company based in Menlo Park, California founded in 2015 seeking to develop an early cancer screening test for people who do not have symptoms. As a startup it was a subsidiary of Illumina, which bought it outright in 2021.
CMCL vs GRAL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2024 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $46.9M | $43.6M |
| Net Profit | $3.3M | $-99.2M |
| Gross Margin | 41.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | 18.6% | -285.4% |
| Net Margin | 7.0% | -227.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.8% | 14.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -33.3% | -2.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | $-2.37 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $43.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $36.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $35.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $31.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $38.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.9M | $28.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $50.1M | $32.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $38.5M | $26.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-99.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-89.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-114.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-106.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-97.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3M | $-125.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.2M | $-1.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1M | $-218.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 41.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 45.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 35.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -285.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -346.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -446.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -482.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -358.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.6% | -640.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.2% | -5133.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.8% | -851.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | -227.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -245.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -320.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -333.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -253.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.0% | -438.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.3% | -4958.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.4% | -819.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-2.37 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-2.46 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-3.18 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-3.10 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-1.49 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.13 | $-3.94 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.42 | $-51.06 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.07 | $-7.05 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $7.2M | $249.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $231.0M | $2.6B |
| Total Assets | $339.7M | $2.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $249.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $126.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $127.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $133.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $214.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.2M | $853.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.4M | $958.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8M | $199.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $231.0M | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $231.1M | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $220.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $339.7M | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $338.5M | $3.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $321.8M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $4.6M | $-63.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-63.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -146.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.40× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-299.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-63.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-63.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-77.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-95.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.6M | $-104.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.1M | $-171.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-207.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-63.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-63.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-77.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-95.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-105.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-173.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-209.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | -146.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -175.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -217.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -298.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -368.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -541.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -785.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 9.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.40× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.87× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CMCL
Segment breakdown not available.
GRAL
| Screening Revenue | $42.3M | 97% |
| Developmental Services Revenue | $1.3M | 3% |
