vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Caledonia Mining Corp Plc (CMCL) and ImmunityBio, Inc. (IBRX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Caledonia Mining Corp Plc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($46.9M vs $38.3M, roughly 1.2× ImmunityBio, Inc.). Caledonia Mining Corp Plc runs the higher net margin — 7.0% vs -161.8%, a 168.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ImmunityBio, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (407.0% vs 13.8%).
Hochschild Mining plc is a leading British-based silver and gold mining business operating in North, Central, and South America. It is headquartered in Lima, Peru, with a corporate office in London, is listed on the London Stock Exchange and is a constituent of the FTSE 250 Index. The main shareholder is the Peruvian businessman Eduardo Hochschild.
ImmunityBio, Inc. is a clinical-stage biotechnology company focused on developing next-generation immunotherapies and vaccine candidates targeting multiple cancer types and infectious diseases. It operates mainly in the U.S. market, with core R&D segments including cell therapy, antibody therapeutics, and targeted vaccine platforms designed to enhance patient treatment outcomes.
CMCL vs IBRX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2024 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $46.9M | $38.3M |
| Net Profit | $3.3M | $-61.9M |
| Gross Margin | 41.2% | 99.0% |
| Operating Margin | 18.6% | -169.0% |
| Net Margin | 7.0% | -161.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.8% | 407.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -33.3% | -4.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | $-0.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $38.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $32.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $26.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $16.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.9M | $6.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $50.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $38.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-61.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-67.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-92.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-129.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-59.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3M | $-85.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 99.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 99.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 99.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 99.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 41.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 45.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 35.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -169.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -173.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -269.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -390.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -919.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.6% | -1314.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -161.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -209.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -350.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -784.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -783.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.0% | -1404.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.06 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.07 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.10 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.15 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.08 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.13 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.42 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.07 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $7.2M | $242.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $231.0M | $-500.5M |
| Total Assets | $339.7M | $501.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $242.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $257.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $153.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $61.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $149.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.2M | $130.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-500.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-524.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-570.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-591.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-489.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $231.0M | $-745.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $231.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $220.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $501.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $519.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $402.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $303.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $382.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $339.7M | $364.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $338.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $321.8M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $4.6M | $-70.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-71.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -186.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.40× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-308.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-70.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-68.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-79.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-85.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-85.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.6M | $-98.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-71.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-69.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-80.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-87.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-87.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-101.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -186.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -217.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -305.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -526.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -1155.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -1663.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 6.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 45.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.40× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.87× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.