vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Caledonia Mining Corp Plc (CMCL) and Katapult Holdings, Inc. (KPLT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Katapult Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($73.9M vs $46.9M, roughly 1.6× Caledonia Mining Corp Plc). Katapult Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 26.8% vs 7.0%, a 19.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Katapult Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (17.3% vs 13.8%). Over the past eight quarters, Caledonia Mining Corp Plc's revenue compounded faster (17.1% CAGR vs 6.6%).
Hochschild Mining plc is a leading British-based silver and gold mining business operating in North, Central, and South America. It is headquartered in Lima, Peru, with a corporate office in London, is listed on the London Stock Exchange and is a constituent of the FTSE 250 Index. The main shareholder is the Peruvian businessman Eduardo Hochschild.
Katapult Holdings, Inc. is a U.S.-based fintech company that provides accessible point-of-sale lease-to-purchase solutions for consumers with limited or no traditional credit history. It partners with a wide network of e-commerce platforms and brick-and-mortar retail merchants across segments including electronics, furniture and home goods to offer flexible payment plans for customers to obtain needed products.
CMCL vs KPLT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2024 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $46.9M | $73.9M |
| Net Profit | $3.3M | $19.8M |
| Gross Margin | 41.2% | 15.6% |
| Operating Margin | 18.6% | -1.4% |
| Net Margin | 7.0% | 26.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.8% | 17.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -33.3% | 307.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | $3.69 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $73.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $74.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $71.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $71.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $63.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.9M | $60.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $50.1M | $58.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $38.5M | $65.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $19.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-4.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-7.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-5.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-9.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3M | $-8.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.2M | $-6.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1M | $-570.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | 15.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 19.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 15.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 19.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 11.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 41.2% | 19.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 45.8% | 16.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 35.9% | 25.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | -1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -7.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.6% | -7.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.2% | -4.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.8% | 5.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 26.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -6.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -10.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -7.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -15.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.0% | -14.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.3% | -11.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.4% | -0.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | $3.69 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.94 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-1.63 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.23 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-2.17 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.13 | $-2.05 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.42 | $-1.61 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.07 | $-0.13 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $7.2M | $22.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $231.0M | $-38.1M |
| Total Assets | $339.7M | $107.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $22.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.2M | $25.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.4M | $33.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8M | $31.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-38.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-58.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-54.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-51.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-46.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $231.0M | $-40.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $231.1M | $-32.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $220.3M | $-27.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $107.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $85.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $90.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $88.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $93.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $339.7M | $92.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $338.5M | $106.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $321.8M | $106.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $4.6M | $-11.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-12.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -16.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.40× | -0.60× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-11.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-6.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-32.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.6M | $-5.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.1M | $-628.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-12.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-32.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-5.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-653.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -16.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -51.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -9.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -1.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | -0.60× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.40× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.87× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
