vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Caledonia Mining Corp Plc (CMCL) and CS Disco, Inc. (LAW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Caledonia Mining Corp Plc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($46.9M vs $41.2M, roughly 1.1× CS Disco, Inc.). Caledonia Mining Corp Plc runs the higher net margin — 7.0% vs -20.7%, a 27.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Caledonia Mining Corp Plc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.8% vs 11.3%). Over the past eight quarters, Caledonia Mining Corp Plc's revenue compounded faster (17.1% CAGR vs 7.6%).
Hochschild Mining plc is a leading British-based silver and gold mining business operating in North, Central, and South America. It is headquartered in Lima, Peru, with a corporate office in London, is listed on the London Stock Exchange and is a constituent of the FTSE 250 Index. The main shareholder is the Peruvian businessman Eduardo Hochschild.
CS Disco, Inc. is a leading legal technology provider that develops cloud-based software solutions for legal practitioners. Its core offerings include e-discovery, document review, case management, and legal workflow automation tools, serving law firms, corporate legal teams, and government legal departments primarily in North America.
CMCL vs LAW — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2024 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $46.9M | $41.2M |
| Net Profit | $3.3M | $-8.5M |
| Gross Margin | 41.2% | 75.1% |
| Operating Margin | 18.6% | -22.4% |
| Net Margin | 7.0% | -20.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.8% | 11.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -33.3% | 66.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | $-0.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $41.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $40.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $38.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $36.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $37.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.9M | $36.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $50.1M | $36.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $38.5M | $35.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-8.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-13.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-10.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-11.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-25.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3M | $-9.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.2M | $-10.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1M | $-10.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 75.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 75.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 74.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 74.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 74.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 41.2% | 73.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 45.8% | 74.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 35.9% | 75.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | -22.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -35.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -31.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -34.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -70.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.6% | -30.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.2% | -34.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.8% | -34.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | -20.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -33.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -28.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -31.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -68.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.0% | -25.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.3% | -30.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.4% | -29.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.22 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.18 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.19 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.43 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.13 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.42 | $-0.18 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.07 | $-0.17 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $7.2M | $114.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $231.0M | $128.1M |
| Total Assets | $339.7M | $173.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $114.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $113.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $114.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $118.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $129.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.2M | $126.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.4M | $130.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8M | $148.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $128.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $130.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $137.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $142.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $147.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $231.0M | $167.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $231.1M | $170.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $220.3M | $193.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $173.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $174.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $164.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $168.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $180.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $339.7M | $194.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $338.5M | $198.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $321.8M | $217.3M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $4.6M | $762.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $255.0K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 0.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.40× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-18.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $762.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-979.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-4.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-10.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.6M | $-2.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.1M | $-650.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-7.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $255.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-2.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-5.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-11.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-3.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-8.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -5.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -13.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -30.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -10.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -3.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -22.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.40× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.87× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CMCL
Segment breakdown not available.
LAW
| Software | $35.1M | 85% |
| Services | $6.0M | 15% |
