vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Caledonia Mining Corp Plc (CMCL) and NATURAL RESOURCE PARTNERS LP (NRP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

NATURAL RESOURCE PARTNERS LP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($51.3M vs $46.9M, roughly 1.1× Caledonia Mining Corp Plc). NATURAL RESOURCE PARTNERS LP runs the higher net margin — 78.5% vs 7.0%, a 71.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Caledonia Mining Corp Plc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.8% vs -21.8%). Over the past eight quarters, Caledonia Mining Corp Plc's revenue compounded faster (17.1% CAGR vs -8.3%).

Hochschild Mining plc is a leading British-based silver and gold mining business operating in North, Central, and South America. It is headquartered in Lima, Peru, with a corporate office in London, is listed on the London Stock Exchange and is a constituent of the FTSE 250 Index. The main shareholder is the Peruvian businessman Eduardo Hochschild.

Natural Resource Partners LP is a U.S.-headquartered master limited partnership that owns, manages and leases mineral reserve interests. Its asset portfolio covers coal, aggregates, industrial minerals and oil & gas, with operations primarily across North America, deriving most revenue from royalties paid by third-party resource extraction operators.

CMCL vs NRP — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
NRP
NRP
1.1× larger
NRP
$51.3M
$46.9M
CMCL
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
CMCL
CMCL
+35.6% gap
CMCL
13.8%
-21.8%
NRP
Higher net margin
NRP
NRP
71.5% more per $
NRP
78.5%
7.0%
CMCL
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
CMCL
CMCL
Annualised
CMCL
17.1%
-8.3%
NRP

Income Statement — Q3 FY2024 vs Q1 FY2025

Metric
CMCL
CMCL
NRP
NRP
Revenue
$46.9M
$51.3M
Net Profit
$3.3M
$40.3M
Gross Margin
41.2%
Operating Margin
18.6%
83.7%
Net Margin
7.0%
78.5%
Revenue YoY
13.8%
-21.8%
Net Profit YoY
-33.3%
-28.4%
EPS (diluted)
$0.13

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
CMCL
CMCL
NRP
NRP
Q1 25
$51.3M
Q4 24
$61.8M
Q3 24
$46.9M
$50.4M
Q2 24
$50.1M
$54.6M
Q1 24
$38.5M
$65.6M
Q4 23
$38.7M
$72.9M
Q3 23
$41.2M
$68.5M
Q2 23
$37.0M
$61.0M
Net Profit
CMCL
CMCL
NRP
NRP
Q1 25
$40.3M
Q4 24
$42.8M
Q3 24
$3.3M
$38.6M
Q2 24
$10.2M
$46.1M
Q1 24
$2.1M
$56.2M
Q4 23
$-2.6M
$65.0M
Q3 23
$4.9M
$63.8M
Q2 23
$-2.5M
$70.3M
Gross Margin
CMCL
CMCL
NRP
NRP
Q1 25
Q4 24
Q3 24
41.2%
Q2 24
45.8%
Q1 24
35.9%
Q4 23
27.3%
Q3 23
34.3%
Q2 23
29.5%
Operating Margin
CMCL
CMCL
NRP
NRP
Q1 25
83.7%
Q4 24
74.9%
Q3 24
18.6%
84.9%
Q2 24
32.2%
92.3%
Q1 24
13.8%
91.0%
Q4 23
6.0%
94.5%
Q3 23
22.4%
98.8%
Q2 23
2.5%
Net Margin
CMCL
CMCL
NRP
NRP
Q1 25
78.5%
Q4 24
69.2%
Q3 24
7.0%
76.6%
Q2 24
20.3%
84.4%
Q1 24
5.4%
85.7%
Q4 23
-6.7%
89.1%
Q3 23
12.0%
93.2%
Q2 23
-6.8%
115.3%
EPS (diluted)
CMCL
CMCL
NRP
NRP
Q1 25
Q4 24
Q3 24
$0.13
Q2 24
$0.42
Q1 24
$0.07
Q4 23
$-0.19
Q3 23
$0.21
Q2 23
$-0.14

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
CMCL
CMCL
NRP
NRP
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$7.2M
$30.9M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$138.8M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$231.0M
Total Assets
$339.7M
$772.5M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
CMCL
CMCL
NRP
NRP
Q1 25
$30.9M
Q4 24
$30.4M
Q3 24
$7.2M
$30.9M
Q2 24
$15.4M
$32.3M
Q1 24
$1.8M
$11.0M
Q4 23
$6.7M
$12.0M
Q3 23
$10.8M
$18.4M
Q2 23
$12.8M
$10.7M
Total Debt
CMCL
CMCL
NRP
NRP
Q1 25
$138.8M
Q4 24
$142.1M
Q3 24
$197.4M
Q2 24
$210.3M
Q1 24
$188.8M
Q4 23
$155.1M
Q3 23
$207.5M
Q2 23
$182.4M
Stockholders' Equity
CMCL
CMCL
NRP
NRP
Q1 25
Q4 24
Q3 24
$231.0M
Q2 24
$231.1M
Q1 24
$220.3M
Q4 23
$224.2M
Q3 23
$226.6M
Q2 23
$224.3M
Total Assets
CMCL
CMCL
NRP
NRP
Q1 25
$772.5M
Q4 24
$772.9M
Q3 24
$339.7M
$772.9M
Q2 24
$338.5M
$789.6M
Q1 24
$321.8M
$772.9M
Q4 23
$328.3M
$797.9M
Q3 23
$320.3M
$815.2M
Q2 23
$313.9M
$820.3M

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
CMCL
CMCL
NRP
NRP
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$4.6M
$34.4M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.40×
0.86×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
CMCL
CMCL
NRP
NRP
Q1 25
$34.4M
Q4 24
$66.2M
Q3 24
$4.6M
$54.1M
Q2 24
$19.1M
$56.6M
Q1 24
$71.5M
Q4 23
$77.8M
Q3 23
$14.5M
$78.9M
Q2 23
$-2.2M
$81.3M
Free Cash Flow
CMCL
CMCL
NRP
NRP
Q1 25
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24
Q1 24
Q4 23
Q3 23
Q2 23
$81.3M
FCF Margin
CMCL
CMCL
NRP
NRP
Q1 25
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24
Q1 24
Q4 23
Q3 23
Q2 23
133.3%
Capex Intensity
CMCL
CMCL
NRP
NRP
Q1 25
Q4 24
0.0%
Q3 24
0.0%
Q2 24
0.0%
Q1 24
0.0%
Q4 23
0.0%
Q3 23
0.0%
Q2 23
0.0%
Cash Conversion
CMCL
CMCL
NRP
NRP
Q1 25
0.86×
Q4 24
1.55×
Q3 24
1.40×
1.40×
Q2 24
1.87×
1.23×
Q1 24
1.27×
Q4 23
1.20×
Q3 23
2.94×
1.24×
Q2 23
1.16×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

CMCL
CMCL

Segment breakdown not available.

NRP
NRP

Coal Royalty Revenues$35.5M69%
Soda Ash Segment$4.6M9%
Transportation And Processing Services$4.4M9%
Production Lease Minimum Revenues$2.7M5%
Oil And Gas Royalty Revenues$2.4M5%
Other$1.6M3%

Related Comparisons