vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Caledonia Mining Corp Plc (CMCL) and Owlet, Inc. (OWLT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Caledonia Mining Corp Plc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($46.9M vs $26.6M, roughly 1.8× Owlet, Inc.). Caledonia Mining Corp Plc runs the higher net margin — 7.0% vs -34.6%, a 41.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Owlet, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (29.6% vs 13.8%). Over the past eight quarters, Owlet, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (34.2% CAGR vs 17.1%).
Hochschild Mining plc is a leading British-based silver and gold mining business operating in North, Central, and South America. It is headquartered in Lima, Peru, with a corporate office in London, is listed on the London Stock Exchange and is a constituent of the FTSE 250 Index. The main shareholder is the Peruvian businessman Eduardo Hochschild.
Owlet, Inc. is a pediatric health technology firm that develops smart wearable monitoring products for infants, most notably its signature smart sock that tracks real-time heart rate, oxygen levels, and sleep metrics. It serves global consumer markets across North America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific, distributing products via direct-to-consumer e-commerce and partnered retail outlets, focused on supporting parental peace of mind and infant health safety.
CMCL vs OWLT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2024 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $46.9M | $26.6M |
| Net Profit | $3.3M | $-9.2M |
| Gross Margin | 41.2% | 47.6% |
| Operating Margin | 18.6% | -18.4% |
| Net Margin | 7.0% | -34.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.8% | 29.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -33.3% | -1.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $26.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $32.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $26.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $21.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $20.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.9M | $22.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $50.1M | $20.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $38.5M | $14.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-9.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-37.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-9.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3M | $-5.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.2M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1M | $3.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | 47.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 50.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 51.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 53.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 53.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 41.2% | 52.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 45.8% | 49.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 35.9% | 44.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | -18.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -7.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -12.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -36.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.6% | -21.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.2% | -10.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.8% | -39.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | -34.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 12.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -144.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 14.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -44.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.0% | -25.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.3% | -5.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.4% | 22.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-2.37 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.11 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.15 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.13 | $-0.61 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.42 | $-0.30 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.07 | $-0.51 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $7.2M | $35.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $231.0M | $19.0M |
| Total Assets | $339.7M | $85.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $35.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $23.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $21.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $16.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $20.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.2M | $21.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.4M | $15.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8M | $18.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $4.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $19.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-54.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-59.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-25.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-29.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $231.0M | $-21.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $231.1M | $-33.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $220.3M | $-32.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $85.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $74.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $63.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $51.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $49.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $339.7M | $56.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $338.5M | $45.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $321.8M | $43.8M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $4.6M | $-452.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-651.0K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -2.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.40× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-11.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-452.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-2.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-5.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.6M | $-7.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.1M | $-3.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-3.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-651.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-2.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-5.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-7.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-3.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -2.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -6.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -8.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -28.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -33.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -16.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -0.52× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -1.96× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.40× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.87× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -1.03× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CMCL
Segment breakdown not available.
OWLT
| US | $22.7M | 85% |
| Non Us | $3.2M | 12% |
| Other | $651.0K | 2% |
