vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Caledonia Mining Corp Plc (CMCL) and SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC (SD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Caledonia Mining Corp Plc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($46.9M vs $39.4M, roughly 1.2× SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC). SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC runs the higher net margin — 54.9% vs 7.0%, a 47.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Caledonia Mining Corp Plc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.8% vs 1.1%). Over the past eight quarters, Caledonia Mining Corp Plc's revenue compounded faster (17.1% CAGR vs 14.1%).
Hochschild Mining plc is a leading British-based silver and gold mining business operating in North, Central, and South America. It is headquartered in Lima, Peru, with a corporate office in London, is listed on the London Stock Exchange and is a constituent of the FTSE 250 Index. The main shareholder is the Peruvian businessman Eduardo Hochschild.
SandRidge Energy, Inc. is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration in the Mid-Continent region of the United States. It is organized in Delaware and headquartered in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
CMCL vs SD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2024 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $46.9M | $39.4M |
| Net Profit | $3.3M | $21.6M |
| Gross Margin | 41.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | 18.6% | 38.5% |
| Net Margin | 7.0% | 54.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.8% | 1.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -33.3% | 23.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | $0.59 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $39.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $39.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $34.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $42.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $39.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.9M | $30.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $50.1M | $26.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $38.5M | $30.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $21.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $16.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $19.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $13.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $17.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3M | $25.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.2M | $8.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1M | $11.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 41.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 45.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 35.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 38.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 37.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 53.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 28.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 25.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.6% | 28.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.2% | 23.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.8% | 27.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 54.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 40.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 56.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 30.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 45.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.0% | 84.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.3% | 33.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.4% | 36.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.59 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.43 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.53 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.35 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.46 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.13 | $0.69 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.42 | $0.24 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.07 | $0.30 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $7.2M | $111.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $231.0M | $510.9M |
| Total Assets | $339.7M | $644.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $111.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $101.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $102.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $99.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $98.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.2M | $92.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.4M | $209.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8M | $207.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $510.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $492.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $480.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $464.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $460.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $231.0M | $446.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $231.1M | $424.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $220.3M | $419.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $644.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $619.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $602.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $588.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $581.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $339.7M | $565.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $338.5M | $529.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $321.8M | $527.4M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $4.6M | $31.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $14.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 36.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 43.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.40× | 1.46× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $41.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $31.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $25.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $22.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $20.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $26.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.6M | $20.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.1M | $11.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $15.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $14.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $7.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $13.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $13.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $10.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $9.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $14.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 36.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 14.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 21.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 32.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 33.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 36.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 34.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 48.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 43.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 48.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 45.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 15.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 32.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 33.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 9.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.46× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.58× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.17× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.56× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.48× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.40× | 0.82× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.87× | 1.30× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.41× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CMCL
Segment breakdown not available.
SD
| Oil Reserves | $19.0M | 48% |
| Natural Gas Reserves | $11.6M | 30% |
| Natural Gas Liquids Reserves | $8.7M | 22% |
